Member Info for LGO-fan

Just a final word from my side (and I couldn’t care less about PQE), but something doesn’t sit well with me about you: you ramp months on end about PQE and now you say that they have not cracked the technical and commercial code yet. Right! Sounds a bit like a Monty Python sketch to me. “So apart from not having cracked the technology and not knowing how to commercialise said technology, all is going according to plan”. And you expect people to take you seriously?

post (strongly) recommend! Compared to Dross, LLL is a moderate, lol!

Agree on all counts.

you have confirmed that indeed they haven't cracked both crucial point, explaining the share drop.
Hmm...okay, let's see but still see this as a potential means to an end. Nothing more, but if it doesn't work out for PQE, it should not stop the progress of AOGL. If it works out, all the better, but I would reco to focus on the core business, and all this talk from the last months on PQE I find a bit misleading, if I am honest.

I agree with the sentiment of that song. You used to be the hardcore deramper here. But than Ross came along, and pushed you from your throne (o, dear). Now, and compared to Ross, I do find you quite...."mellow, mellow".

Having said that, not the brightest move from LK not to issue the Q2 results. Can only turn against him.

Let me rephrase: I couldn’t see how PQE was going to make substantial revenues from the latest deals announced. Do you think that I am alone or do you feel there is a case for concern?

any facts to back this up? I couldn’t see the big commercial interest if the deals that were announced by PQE recently. Felt a bit like warm about it. Judging by the sp, so does the city. Please tell me why everyone is wrong and you are right?

wind up Helpful and Ors, unintentionally (I promise!) but did you see the PQE SP....
Would have assumed with the recent commercial interest that the SP would have picked up by now. Starting to wonder how if there is something (fundamentally) wrong with their business model. I know it is a technology play (more than pure O&G), but wonder if the recent announced deals bring to light the challenges in monetizing the technology? (I may be talking pure b***s)

Noah
1. think
2. SWP
3. dumbest post I have ever read - congrats! (you just beat Dross!)

not looking good

https://markets.businessinsider.com/amp/news/oil-price-slides-into-bear-market-global-slowdown-recession-concerns-2019-8-1028428222

Thanks, Donald!!

https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-global-oil/oil-sets-new-seven-month-low-on-trade-tensions-idUKKCN1UX028

correct - he did say that... in July, I believe. (Q&A either during or after the presentation)

hi, please check Helpful's post. He wrote about a a couple of weeks ago, if I recall correctly

From zero to 100bopd is not bad at all.
Now the next phase is required. Reserve reports in hand and a plan to extract the oil. Who knows, they may get to that 300-500bopd target after all (in a profitable manner whiteout dilution please!).

(sorry some typo's)
------
Hi Sugardaddy,

Good points. Your post shows the benefit of balanced views. You at look at the positives and the negatives and come to a conclusion: you invest or you don't. Simple, logical and clear.

But there are others - Ross being one them - who only see negatives. Explain that to me. He is equally stupid as those who only see positives. But I have rarely seen anyone post on here that there are only positives to CERP. We have however, all seen Ross post that there are only negatives here. Go figure. Objectivity out of the window.

In addition to his biased views, he has a tendency to repeat his views (that very few care about) ad nauseam! Judging by his number of posts, you would think he is the biggest shareholder at CERP, yet he has made it clear he has no shares here and has no intention to ever invest here. So why clog up this BB with one-sided views and irritate posters with his Groundhog Day posting style. It will irritate most very quickly.

So don't pretend for one second he is a genuine poster - you come across as for too intelligent for that.

All the best

Good points. Your post shows the benefit of balanced views. You at look at the positives and the negatives and come to a conclusion: you invest or you don't. Simple, logical and clear.

But there are others - Ross being one them - who only see negatives. Explain that to me. It is equally stupid as those who only see positives. But I have rarely seen anyone post that there are only positives to CERP. We have however, all seen Ross post that there are only negatives here. Go figure. Objectivity out of the window.

In addition to his biased views, he has a tendency to repeat his views (that very few care about ad nauseam). Judging by his number of posts, you would think he is the biggest shareholder at CERP, yet he has made it clear he has no shares here and has no intention to ever invest here. So what clog up this BB with one-sided views and irritate posters with his Groundhog Day posting style. It will irritate most very quickly.

So don't pretend for one second he is a genuine poster - you come across as for too intelligent for that.

All the best

I think you are absolutely right. Perfect summary. I would actually argue that their progress has been very. As quick as you could logically hope for given the circumstances. I am a fairly recent shareholder so appreciate I will have (a bit) more patience than the LTHs.

Next steps will be interesting: this is where the short to mid term plans will need to start to come to life. That will attract interest and hopefully more buying pressure.

Oh, yeah! Good one: I had forgotten about that gem...he did ask money to stop posting here. What a joke. Completely forgot (the brain has a tendency to push out bad memories. lol)

The difference between you and me is that I call out what I see as the good, the bad and the ugly. You only speak about what is ugly - and often it’s not even backed up by facts. Makes you biased. You only rant here about CERP to than promote other shares. Seems your only motive to be here as far as I can tell. Plus to kill any kind of positive exchange on this BB.

LK has made some great progress, and has dropped the ball on certain occasions IMHO. As long as he gets its right more often than not: not a problem. So yes, and I stand by that comment: he wasn’t delivering vs his expectations. And like everyone, if he failed he would be replaced. Simples.
The biggest expectations is the SWP: I have made it pretty clear that I am here for that project. So with the progress announced last RNS, I am naturally quite happy and excited.

what a lovely BB this has been since the arrival of Dross. it’s quite ironic: he and his palls want to create a forum for their discontent, yet have killed this BB up to a point no one is reading it anymore. So effectively they are talking to themselves all along. I really don’t mind, but there are other ways of doing that. They could get a room for example?

Well, I guess it could just be me and everyone else is enjoying reading their pearls of wisdom:-)