Member Info for lejjb

I looked outside and can�t believe it either!!

“Your posting that claim on ADVFN, not LSE” I meant to type.

Seadog5 - I wrote �of its own� specifically. I should have spelt it out as meaning �taking the consortium members aside�. The Xcite debacle showed that the consortium members did not provide much (any?) financial support at a point when it was clearly necessary to make things happen. I�ll look into details of that firepower comparison over the weekend if I get the time. And I don�t even get why you and others feel like attacking me on this point as it was to illustrate something that we agree with: Bentley is likely not to be coming for now. People who keep hinting more or less subtly at it are being disingenuous IMO. Last throw - apologies for having written harshly about you. I could have measured my words better. You have not read my follow up post though, that�s pick and mix on your part as well. However, I do not find it good form to spread alleged quasi-insider knowledge about the number of fields supposedly actively targeted, and your not posting that claim on ADVFN and not LSE makes wonder whether you thought moderators on this board would think the same. Enjoy Dorset nonetheless. MajorMiner - grow up.

Hi all You all should check the NUOG BB now and then - it�s fanatical over there, and some people use ADVFN to make quasi-insider claims that would not be allowed on LSE in the hope (fulfilled) that others on LSE will make reference to those!... LION is not looking very pretty and I fell into the trap of buying back on too quickly.

I am speaking as neither, and lost money in all three last placings from NUOG when I did "believe" too. And since you insist on labeling me, and you can see from my posting history that I have been actively following that company since Autumn 2016. I stay in a company when I believe that its SP will grow, and sell when I believe it will go down. My view of NUOG has evolved with the way its shareholders have been treated, and the SP's behaviour in response. And I don't put an LTHs on pedestals - they also want the SP to grow and will stop being LTHs the moment the SP reaches a price they like.

Sharelock - at least this is a real answer of substance, not something based on attacking another poster personally. I disagree with some of this second post, but at least I respect it.

It's a public board, I don't predict doom and gloom nor do I make wild speculations, and I note that you ignored most of what I've written my last two posts (Bentley or the MFDevCo disappointments so far), instead focusing most of your post on attacking me personally.

IIRC, SBP's reasoning was almost identical to that of the mystery poster (I can't recall the name.) whom I mentioned earlier. It was based on matching the current consortium members of MFDevCo with those who were associated with (the now-defunct) Xcite Energy, plus the current/updated UK energy policy. However, the collapse of Xcite, which had bigger firepower of its own compared to MFDevCo's IIRC, has confirmed that MFDevCo is still too small fry, at least for now. Furthermore, IIRC too, the ownership of the rights to Bentley is still a massive stinking mess. Please see some totally unofficial former PIs' comments on this site: http://www.lse.co.uk/ShareChat.asp?page=1&ShareTicker=XEL Sure, I'd be happy to be wrong, but there has been waaaay too much BS on this site for more than a year about "Beluga caviar with a side of foie gras tomorrow " (happily encouraged, or at least allowed, by the BoD, who stuffed two 3 placings up our backsides on the back of that) that I'd rather focus on what's been proven to be tangible: Garden Hill. Getting that first MFDevCo deal is purely speculative, as confirmed by the slap in the face that was Barryroe (especially considering that COSL is one of the Barryroe consortium members!!). Even more so for the massive Bentley field.

http://www.lse.co.uk/share-regulatory-news.asp?shareprice=EVRH&ArticleCode=0o72a8ft&ArticleHeadline=Final_Results&ahc=rcahi5fd

My mistake, he did say that he "does not" recollect Bentley being mentioned... although the addition of "but I could be wrong." still does not impress me much.

He may be our biggest PI, but his posting on a mostly unregulated BB (i.e. ADVFN's) does not impress me at all. Unless he is banned from LSE.co.uk ? As to his umpteenth reference to Bentley, as has been written many times on this board, it was something thrown in the air by a poster who had appeared out of the blue just after the SP went down temporarily on the w/c 23 June 2017, straight after the initial first rise from the depths of the 0.30s that month. That poster disappeared into the ether as soon as the SP resumed its rise back in early July... But why let the confirmation of lack of evidence get in the way of a good story, eh?

https://twitter.com/DDS_DocHoliday/status/990946750377668608 His tweets do increase the profile of a share: if he still supports it at the current level, this may entice more buys before close.

Gents (and ladies?), with all due respect, you are driving yourselves bonkers by spending so much time on this share everyday. Let is rest. put your RNS alert on and enjoy your lives until that red dot appears on your screens...

An II that invests on behalf of a client goes for low risk and relatively well established businesses, unless you are talking about a trading business like Henderson's, or a VC entity that usually buys not-yet-listed companies. Until there that long-awaited research note providing a detailed analysis of the business model and financial prospect is finally issued, there is too much uncertainty around that business from the PoV of a money manager.

To stop being a penny share, the SP has to go to 100+p - maybe not quite yet. ;-)

It seems we are getting ourselves lost in the entanglement of farmers (?) and farmees and their respective webs of patent companies and subsidiaries. I wonder if that slows down that long awaited research note - I keep banging on about it, but it’s the first step to decluttering the picture for external investors.

Good morning all! I hope nobody has to be outdoors much this week... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-43943001

Several "I've just bought some now." and even a couple of not-so-good chartists are at it on Twitter. This bodes well for the sentiment on this share. I might just hate myself a little less for having sold NCCL too early now...

Several "I've just bought some now." and even a couple of not-so-good chartists are at it. This bodes well for the sentiment on this share.

Confirmation that a revised submission to the regulators in Newfoundland was sent on the 17 April, after a request for amends to the first one... http://nu-oilandgas.com/projects/asset-overview/Newfoundland-PL2002-1A