Member Info for lebugue-addick

Ecua - disagree. If the oil price was low say $30 or below then 88e wouldn't bother looking for now

Stockdale - an oil price of $70 must be better for 88e than say $30 I am sure you would agree.

pleased to see miloh's 10.01 post has now been removed.

Spelling mistake in my previous post - should have been obnoxious. Put that down to annoyance with miloh posts!

milo post 10.01. I invite posters to report miloh's 10.01 post which has taken his normally abnoxious posts one stage further. He has no proof to his assertions. I will report. Just about had enough of his games so this time he has overstepped the mark.

So dilution only 8 per cent instead of around 11%. And contrary to some posts forecasting as low as 0.5p it was at the full 0.7pence.

So was expecting a positive SP reaction. Typical AIM.

PMO are debt laden. They do not have a load of spare cash

A suspension in Oz should mean a suspension in London in my opinion. Have never agreed with a 2 tier system.

E.T - spelling may not be important to you but I always find if it's a message with long sentences, with loads of spelling mistakes, I sometimes just turn off without getting to the end - and impact lost, no matter how cohesive the argument.

what email to Dave? Have we seen it?

Brom - quite agree. Buyers have slowed up and sellers have increased since FO announcement; an imbalance that will reverse once there is a new base; expecting a rise in October or November as 88e heads for drilling in Q1

jiddy - "Any self respecting investor would "fermer ta bouche", and not indulge in baseless sweeping negative statements". Personally I'm surprised you indulge him with the politeness of first person singular.

manfrom: "the sp seems to have been placed in a very static trading range after the initial fall". A drop of almost 30 per cent from 21 August would hardly be regarded as "static" by many PIs

Brom - thanks for all your work on updating info on this BB. Much appreciated.

Islayman - it's keeping a check on the SP though (fear of it happening maybe); plus the FO wasn't what everyone wanted; plus wider political and market jitters = recipe for people not to buy

can anyone clarify what news we are expecting in the next 4-5 months before drilling

£7m market cap and drifting - 28 per cent down at 12.30pm

S4KS - "You will notice most of the reds today are actually buys. Same was happening yesterday". Poppy****. The SP has been drifting lower from 1.025p on 21 August to today's 0.775p.

As the SP was down all day and the large trade was only reported after hours it is just as likely to have been a sell.

I have skim read the 22 page presentation a couple of times and there is currently a disconnect between the very positive messages and expected outcomes in the RNS compared to the current SP which values the company at only £49m.

Just taking one example - slide 14 - called "Charlie Prospect, Untested subset" the science reported there seems very compelling - "3D seismic inversion predicts good quality, oil filled sands".

Seems just a bit more patience is required before this comes good. GLA

trills - try emailing the company. They need to know