milo post 10.01. I invite posters to report miloh's 10.01 post which has taken his normally abnoxious posts one stage further. He has no proof to his assertions. I will report. Just about had enough of his games so this time he has overstepped the mark.
E.T - spelling may not be important to you but I always find if it's a message with long sentences, with loads of spelling mistakes, I sometimes just turn off without getting to the end - and impact lost, no matter how cohesive the argument.
Brom - quite agree. Buyers have slowed up and sellers have increased since FO announcement; an imbalance that will reverse once there is a new base; expecting a rise in October or November as 88e heads for drilling in Q1
jiddy - "Any self respecting investor would "fermer ta bouche", and not indulge in baseless sweeping negative statements". Personally I'm surprised you indulge him with the politeness of first person singular.
I have skim read the 22 page presentation a couple of times and there is currently a disconnect between the very positive messages and expected outcomes in the RNS compared to the current SP which values the company at only £49m.
Just taking one example - slide 14 - called "Charlie Prospect, Untested subset" the science reported there seems very compelling - "3D seismic inversion predicts good quality, oil filled sands".
Seems just a bit more patience is required before this comes good. GLA