Member Info for Lazarus2

No thanks Maj. You carry on though - your lot are corrupt to the hilt

I can make my own decisions actually Maj, and will buy as and when I feel it is right.

Are you concerned that any buying will upset your planned Bear raid? I also don't give a stuff about RF either.

As predicted - no surprises there - could represent a buying opportunity if you wait it out

Bear raid incoming - I will be buying at a suitable juncture. News not far off

Member since 2015 and only 300 or so posts - 44 in the past 30 days? Hardly posted in 8 years? Multiple ID’s I would suggest which would account for the discrepancy.

Also, the number of posts stay at 307 way back to 2018 and beyond and never moves. Spoof account for a city boy. Highly plausible though

Had a look at your posting history PUMA. Yep CoL and Whitesuitguy previous identities I am sure. Same grammatical style. The clincher for me was a post on PREM which claimed he was trying to help investors - just like he did with ROCK whilst it was taken right down. Same modus operandi. Apparently, Bears are erudite and educated whilst Bulls tend to be lacking in education so he offered English lessons.

So that is enough for me not to take him seriously. Bear attack Monday nailed on

Bang on Leggster. Much better for negotiations to take place with a healthy Bank balance in place. That way Sareum can take their time and negotiate from a relative position of strength. Any projections or forecasts should be based upon Newsflow potential, progress and increasing valuations for 1801, 1802 and 737. We have a timeline for 1801 and, provided that the science is validated, the market cap should be well north of where it is now let alone Pumas prediction.

Same old, same old with the Fudsters. Only turn up ahead of a planned drop or to get threads removed. Must be good news expected but not imminent maybe.

Just spivs trying to turn a buck or two. It’ll pass and news will arrive. MMs “commercial intelligence network” on display

I would agree SMT - Part 1 should be complete and the data in the hands of the safety review committee. Looks as though HBD may be close with his prediction.

Sareum - healing the world (In time)

Nurse! Nurse! He’s out of bed again

I share your confidence Krone. Not sure we will get clarity on 737 though. If there is a trading update we may just get "we continue to engage" etc: I am hoping that the next update for 737 is a deal of some description.

Year end results were released on 24th October last year, so I have this period as my focus. It should provide accurate updates on 1801, 1802 and, if still relevant. 737.

A timely progress report with regards to 1801 would be welcome in the coming week. It would also serve as an indicator for 1802.

I think Damions post is indicating that a more advanced trial has shown no issues - all still looking very positive

Thanks for clarifying Sad. It’s a pity that MHRA seem incapable of effective support. The 1801

Data will be pivotal to our shorter term success. Sareum is definitely entering a crucial period of development and I would not be surprised to see us snapped up in the coming 12-18 months

Shhhh! Matty. We are all hand wringing. Not a buy to be seen!

If the trades are to be believed then there must be a few chunky buys waiting to go through. Either that or we tick down.

News is due and - other than an exceptional news drop, I would expect the sp to rise ahead of news.

Irrespective of terminology, I think it is agreed that Sarum own 27.5% of SRA737.

Also, if Part 1 completed the safety review committee will be reviewing 1801. 1802 coming up on the rails. Not a lot wrong with Sareum and plenty of newsflow lining up for the remainder of the year.

If Carlsberg did goldmines…

10 percenters may slow this a little, but with news due relating to progress this still looks cheap.

I am wondering what percentage Surfie and Co: will use to express their pleasure at seeing the sp rise. Plenty of buying today - all good. I bought more yesterday

Over due a blue day. You can tell who the real antagonists are - and leading with a negative threats title ( can you see what I have done?)