Member Info for Lazarus2

Nothing wrong with that - I think the decent posters have all benefitted from sharing well reasoned points of view - even if they differ. Looking at the two AI summaries they seem pretty decent to me and all of the emotion is removed.

Thanks Potnak - I understand what you are saying and I don’t use it myself. Nice to have an upbeat summary though and something to discuss. Lots of negative misinformation going around without AI though. Time is the test of everything.

Why is that Joey/Surfie - what parts did you disagree with and why. You both obviously have different views - be interested to hear them.

Post of the month

Sareum cannot be sold without sharehOlder approval. Even a conditional offer would have to be voted on by shareholders at an EGM.

No under the table share issues can take place and any formal issue of shares over a set amount will attract a TR-1

The BoD are duty bound to put any formal offer to the shareholders with a recommendation to accept or decline. Again shareholders would vote at an EGM.

So no, I do not think anything has “happened” behind closed doors. Mischief making IMO

Oops

So here is the link - it should be welcomed as it may just begin to clean up AIM and FOI could be used to access outcomes.

https://www.ftadviser.com/regulation/2025/2/18/tisa-warns-of-unintended-consequences-with-name-and-shame-plans/

Have a good day - you all know where I stand and my views so switching off. @Surfie - you need to get those splinters removed from your arris.

Morning JinkkyJ - I am rather flattered that your first post was to report yours truly. The sensible response to the goading here is very straightforward. This is a straightforward choice between whether you believe that the science is credible or you don't. There are no contentious points to be argued such as production figures, sales figures, pricing, value of contracts or the number of contract wins. It is purely about validating the Science and then commercialisation of the science. The sp is not controlled by the BoD )although it can be influenced) but controlled by many MM levers that are often brought into play when there is a dearth of news. What is different though is that there are new proposals to "name and shame" those placed under investigation by the FCA. Not surprisingly, they have had to take their snouts out of the trough to squeal louugh

Yep - spivs and their lackeys working very hard to take the sp down in very little volume. You all know how you operate. Read the other chatboards also. Same happening there. Corrupt as anything

So there’s one of them then

What is happening to Sareums sp is happening across AIM to many other companies. It is an annual event and cyclical in its nature. Sp’s are mauled and coincides with spivs and their lackeys infecting chatboards with their FUD. They want cheap shares which they will want to sell back at a premium once the new ISA allowances kick in, in April. Cynical? You bet!

So what is your take then Surfie and what course of action do you propose for us all?

Looks as though you are getting your wish Faty! Stay defiant to beat the corruption!

Nobody can be pleased with the sp at this level. It is disappointing. Very few trades, little or no news and a seemingly determined group to drop the sp further. I would hazard a guess that the sp drops are fuelling discontent and accentuating differences of opinions between traders and investors. I suspect that the City spivs are anticipating a cash call from Sareum, therefore the lower the sp the greater the number of shares issued for very little cash. It isn't rocket science. It is a harsh reality that we all have individual decisions to make as to whether to crystalise paper losses, buy more as the sp drops or just hold for a deal of some description and ignore the paper loss. So sell and crystalise paper losses or buy to reduce paper losses or just hold. Again, it isn't rocket science. A decent exercise is to visit other chatboards or look at thread headings to see that a lot of Companies are in the same boat with a shedload of naysayers infecting the boards with their respective agendas. That includes out and out rampers who disappear as a rise peters out and the fall back begins. It is all a corrupt cesspit on AIM with the sole intention of screwing retail investors for their hard earned cash. I am fortunate enough to be able to get out at any point. For the record I am continuing to hold and will add in April in my ISA with my other shareholdings being in tangible assets such as gold a rare earth minerals. With USA politicians running amok, GB out on a limb and skint and with Europe being unable to make decisions and also skint God alone knows where we will al be in 2 months time let alone 12 months time.

Good evening Stevej- A chatboard is just that - a chatboard and differing views will always be presented. Ramping and de-ramping is only dangerous when being used to deliberately mislead readers of the chatboard. Most of the time it is more about whether one of us is positive about their investment or negative. It would be boring if everything was “balanced”.

As a point of value though, I do not understand why most get confused by value. You state that we could get £800m per compound which means £1.6bn. Only 125m shares in circulation so just do the arithmetic but also play around with other figures as it gives a fairly decent and varying scale of possibilities.

My final point is regarding cash whilst we weee in pounds. Unfortunately, Sareums value had been pumped. The City knew this and did not want to buy very expensive shares that were still worthless commercially. The rest is history as they say but I don’t think it was a case of Sareum not trying to raise - It was more a case of The City not willing to play ball.

Anyway, time will tell for all of us and I too, wish everyone well

So are you selling at this level or buying at this level DW? Also, what makes you conclude and shout in capital letters that the BoD can actually buy? If any form of negotiations be ongoing then that would be insider dealing wouldn't it?

.....Otherwise very large Pharma could just short the hell out of the share and pick up for virtually nothing. Same applies right across the board on AIM.

Agree with the Radio silence observations and lack of PR. But I do not think that value is governed by sp. It must surely be governed by the product market value. To state that we will be valued somewhere between £50m-£125m cannot be correct.

With. world events as they are and China imposing a ban on exports of Germanium, this news couldn’t have come at a better time. It has created a delay in the JORC but for the most positive of reasons.

Wouldn’t want to be out of this at the weekend!!!!

If that is the case then you can expect Sareum to be sharing the data with a third party. Could come at any time IMO provided the third party sees good data with what is available already.