Member Info for Lazarus2

Or at least get our money back.

Disappointed and frustrating! But having had to read it twice it isn’t being abandoned. Hoping for more clarity sooner rather than later. Difficult RNS for everyone and for the BoD. Need more detail

Agreed BB - once the vitriol starts they all wade in. Some with an agenda some just frustrated. Best to let it ride IMO. Always somebody else’s fault as well. A bit like that bloke trying to sue Betfair at the moment for £1m because they did not protect him from himself!

The way to make a small fortune on AIM is to invest a very large fortune.

The City spivs will want this as low as possible if they sniff financial distress further down the line. That way any raise would be at an extremely low price and they will have gained millions more shares and have the shirts off of our backs (again). It will never change and you can witness this behaviour across AIM. But the mantra is always to buy low (unloved) and sell high. Greed often keeps us in only for the sp to fall away again. Always top slice if you can.

Get a grip Matty - not everything can be a conspiracy as you like to see it. I think there are a lot of factual items missing from your diatribe. I am heavily into GGP and I have seen your rants on there too and now your claiming to be 800% up. It has taken GGP years with lots of criticism en route (from you) to get to the current position. What if Parker's pivoting and maneuvering actually adds to the value and runs against your own conspiritorial thinking? We are all frustrated but I, like a few here, have "reached down the back of the sofa" and bought more. I understand perfectly that it is not for everybody. Good luck with your investment decisions anyway.

Look out of you have a stop loss in place. Buying opportunity presenting itself if you have the inclination. No advice intended

…..It is then. I have registered for the IM. Anticipating plenty of questions.

Yep I totally get the frustration Aber especially when the drift kicks in. But I do not see how there is sufficient dissatisfaction and firepower to do anything about it. I agree about wanting a buyout but most here would take a license if it were negotiated. Sareum must be very close to some form of commercial breakthrough with its Science and perhaps all will become clearer once solid news is released.

Same question for you Aber - what is crunch time? and what do you anticipate?

Potnak - in the space of a few moments you have gone from "There was nothing wrong with the interview" to "The interview was manufactured, awkward and didn't land well". I appreciate that there may well be disappointment but you do sound as if you have a trading agenda. Also, what repercussions are you anticipating at the end of they year?

I should add that the BoD are Industry professionals who have plenty of skin in the game. Their own holdings on a deal completion would dwarf the so-called salary gravy train they are accused of manufacturing. Also, they do not have to be our BoD. I am sure that all of them could obtain other positions very easily should they choose to. But they have stayed loyal and even deferred salary over the years. Keep the faith, follow the news.

Wish we could Mike. The issue here is that frustration often spills over into sack the board comments and thoughts that they are only doing this to enhance their salaries by kicking the can further down the road. I do get the frustration having also been here since God was a teenager! But the BoD are damned if they do and damned if they don't by a few posters on here.

Absolutely nothing wrong with the interview at all - it was aimed at keeping the AI collaboration uppermost in investors minds. The comment that 1801 has an extremely clean profile was also slipped in by John Reader.

Nobody knows if, indeed, they are under the constraints of a NDA. That's how it should be by the very nature of a NDA. But whether they are or they are not, they are absolutely right to carry on as normal with whatever progress they can make along with whatever planning is required. There is cash in the pot for now so In essence, nothing has changed with the exception that AI is progressing as described by SP. There is nothing RNS worthy within that interview. The Nomad would probably reject it as "unsubstantiated".

Just my own thoughts for what they are worth. I remain bullish here.

HBD wasn’t referring to a NDA but was referring to a closed period ahead of the release of results this month. It explains why they cannot invest during this period as it could be deemed as insider trading.

Having just listened to the interview I think we can safely state that there will be another AGM this year! Planning into 2026 and expecting a busy 2026 for CNS compound development. The Elephant in the room will be cash runway (as ever). I sincerely hope for a buy out but it is looking less likely for now given the comments made by Dr Parker.

Really happy with the update though and there does appear to be a plan going forwards. Both seemed genuinely enthused with regards to the AI collaboration. Follow the news - buy the dips

….Last years results were released 29th October but I have it in my head that they were delayed in order to include 1801 progress. Previous year was 9th October so results could be as early as next week.

New shares get admitted tomorrow so it will be very interesting to see how it plays out.

Very much looking forward to the outcomes on the AI collaboration. SP sounds a bit upbeat - remaining confident here and anticipating plenty of news this side of December

Very plausible HBD. Basically, Warrants are entirely down to the warrant holder and their individual needs/strategies. They are often governed by a shareprice at the time of conversion or expiry dates. If it was me I would maybe take a mix'n match approach but each to their own. I suspect the converted shares may well be in sticky hands with news due. Undoubtedly, there will be more to come and they will act as a bit of a brake for the MM's to maintain an orderly market. Maybe I am a bit laissez faire with my approach but I remain pretty unfazed by all of this.

No problem with a Dividend if all of the angles are covered.