Member Info for LAvvocato

Hippy

I try my best.

Unfortunately I get to a stage once a week, or a fortnight, where he has wound me up so much with the naive drivel that I just can't help myself.

Have a great weekend, and to a good week next week!!

F1

I agree.

Dribley is delving the depths again this week, spouting the same nonsense.

On a basic level he doesn't understand what is needed for an announcement to be made (the advisors have to see the agreements that have been signed).

His latest ruse is why are GEX speaking with a company about sharing infrastructure if Harlequin are funding.

This of course ignores the basics of why would we not want more cost effective operations.

We don't have to spend the full $25 million. If we are sharing costs somewhere, then the funding from Harlequin could be deployed elsewhere.

His posts would shame a GCSE economics student, let alone anyone who understands capital markets!!

Dribler does like ignoring facts. Especially those with regard to what is required for an announcement to be made and signed off by professional advisors.

At the same time as spouting nonsense about what they believe to be the facts.

It's a daily merry go round of nonsense.

We need a word with Dribleys carer.

They’re getting out of hand again

Art

Also look at the amount of helium that Space X and their competitors need.

So before the company was listed you had an opinion.

Interesting.

If I knew

I had a look at the Halo website yesterday.

They’ve removed all references to this project and the release with Penspen has no link attached.

Not sure what plan you saw from them, but I never saw much of anything there myself as I’ve said previously.

Dude

We can now add keeping costs down to the list of things that you don't understand.

We are going to need a bigger white board....

You talk about there being no evidence of anything being signed.

Why don't you write to the GEX advisors who would have had to reviewed what was signed in order for it to be announced.

Honestly, you come on here spouting nonsense which only proves how little you know about anything.

They can only sign a framework at the moment.

Normally off take agreements are not signed until a well has been drilled, and the flow rate has been tested etc.

Without seeing the details, I'd guess that the framework also covers the funding which Harlequi are providing...

Benny

Nothing like a self appointed blow hard looking out for "shareholders interests".

I assume that you are like the rest of the gang. None shareholders who have a beef with AH and numerous alter egos.

Benny

You mean none that you know about......

Not that it has any relevance of course.

Art

To your point they are better taking the right amount of time to get things right, rather than rushing!!

For some reason it seems to mainly be the non shareholders who are agitating for things to happen yesterday.

Yes things have been delayed, but if people think that this is like flicking a light switch then they should not be invested.

The same goes for mining and pharmaceuticals.

Panman

I'd imagine so.

Dude

As per the announcements it is Harlequin who have engaged Schlumberger.

Amazing how you come on here as a non shareholder to criticise and agitate and yet struggle with the basics.

As has been pointed out before Schlumberger would have had to have signed off on the announcement which included them.

Again this is pretty basic, so why do you struggle??

Dude

You don't need to keep proving how little you know.

There is no institutional interest as there are no dividends being paid and the market cap is too low.

As per my comment yesterday. You're also clueless about funding contracts.

Dude

You keep banging on about a signed funding contract.

This just shows your lack of knowledge in this area and particularly the timeframes involved in getting these together.

They generally take months. Harlequin only provided their notice to go ahead at the end of last month.

If you believe that this should have been done and announced by now, then you should not be invested in this sector.

Although we know you're just an agitator here!

Dribley

"Back in Oz now to haunt you".

Bit of an odd comment given that AH lives rent free in your head.

Dude

Please send a link to any RNS announcement which contains a copy of a commercially sensitive agreement.

Bjet

I don’t wish to be engage with you either.

Don’t bother responding!

You’ve shown yourself to be completely incompetent on every level.

Toodle pip

Bjet

You were referenced in my comment as I was directly addressing your comments that you’d made earlier.

You along with newbie and Dumley ignored the realities of what would have happened for the announcement to have been made.

You took it upon yourself to trawl through companies house thinking you were brighter than you are.

Ignoring that independent advisors and Schlumberger would have had the sign off on announcement

Your stupidity is highlighted by the fact that you’ve been unable to read and decipher what I’ve written and think that this is related to “the market” agreeing with you….

If you’re “looking out for shareholders” then god help us all.

I go back to my original comments.

Not perfect. Rough ride.

Don’t need people like you commenting!!