Member Info for Laverda

Flyfishery, I don't understand why they don't charge on each registration, the facility to pay is already here.

Better they have genuine people.

Legend, contrary to the press, the coalition is working and others are joining, ECOWAS is crumbling, however the negative side of it is that the terrorists are forced to change tactics and are reduced to the odd attack here and there. Shoot 40 farm workers in a field, blow up this and that.

You can tell they have lost their grip Mali did a massive fuel deal with Niger bringing fuel from the North and the groups are powerless to stop it. While when the UN was there the terrorists dominated the North.

Tardisgx, a very unwell person.

I just wish they would charge an admin fee for a registration then they know who people are.

Anyone know any subscription only share sites?

Muppetguru the costs are not 650 dollars per tonne.

647 dollars per tonne is the AISC cost per tonne at 2,080 dollars average per tonne.

Included in the average figure is capital costs for reclamation, capital costs for future repairs and the tax payable on each tonne.

If for instance 4,000 dollars per tonne made that average, at 4,000 dollars per tonne the AISC may be 1,250 dollars per tonne. We have no idea without the data.

At 850 dollars per tonne it could be 400 dollars per tonne.

Which is why we need nameplate declared, some new figures produced but Bernard needs to explain them in more detail as it is very clear that the costings in this format are too complicated for investors.

That could explain a bit of the discount in share price.

Mike the export licence was made a big deal by some rather than just another stage ticked off the list. More the fool them.

The company will just keep moving down the process and at some point a new raft of investors will take interest in the company, the stage they decide to join will be decided by them not us or Kodal.

The company is progressing and they are well in control of finances etc we look forward to material moving and revenue into KMUK.

The lesson is, don't put one future event onto a crazy pedestal.

Terrorists in Mali always claim shootings.

As far as I am aware they did not claim that guard?

Anyone got evidence to the contrary?

If they have not claimed it, then it was not terrorism.

BFD think you are right.

IvRoche, agree constant green filtered posts from trolls and posters response confirms complete and utter negative tripe.

What a miserable existence they must lead.

AIM is AIM we all know where we are invested.

Off down the fantasy rubbish path yet again.

Mali has a big cotton industry and is massive in mining. All operating as normal.

We had a terrorist issue for decades and it was business as usual.

Just the rebels in the North and the timber gangs in the woods same as it has always been in Mali no change.

The only recent difference is the coalition of countries with their cross border policing appears to be working and the rebel groups are reduced to making little random attacks, less of the more traditional fighting they previously did in the North.

However the press is always lop sided with its reporting. Overall deaths aren't high in Mali, not like some other African countries.

Potatohead, 'it should be higher' I know of no stock investment rules around this.

Where did you get that idea from?

How much do you reckon NAV has risen with that permit?

Potato a shop with stock in it is a shop with second hand stock, nothing more.

A shop with a history of selling is a going concern.

It is you and others on here so upset today, who have decided differently and decided an earlier event was your big pay day.

Kodal has done brilliantly and the steps are going fantastic but they haven't sold anything yet.

They also have not laid out the plan with the two goldfields and how far Nielle progressed before mothballing.

Plenty more ahead.

The same people who make such a massive issue and drama of each step stage and how important they are, are the ones complaining when they don't get the reward that they invented in their minds that they should have received.

Will it ever dawn on them that they are clueless?

Probably not.

Potato whatever strategy works for you.

I bought really early and low and always have been go until gold sold/valued and lithium revenue producing.

If for some reason the AIM madness settles in and it goes beyond my min sell out before then, then sell out.

Really simple strategy. Then the noise doesn't matter.

Malcolm if you are new to AIM it is common rise on the anticipation drop on the news.

However if you take all the share chat rubbish out of it all that graph sh*te and so on, you basically have a start up company that managed to float.

Attract investors and funded its project.

Took a project to a jv venture company to build a mine and plant.

If you forget it is shares and pretend you were going to buy the business as a one off yourself there is no additional value from having the cash and a jv to this moment in time. The next value increase is when it generates money.

So why expect a higher value today?

Based on hope only.

Better to focus on the business instead of all the share chat.

Malcolm J, personally I don't understand your comment.

The two major points in this companies growth for cashing in were the BFS or revenue producing if looking for quick exits.

BFS hit 0.8p good returns for anyone exiting at that point.

It is not revenue producing yet, so that one is not applicable.

What stage were you looking at?

Sharketmare - according to Bernard in the 12th May Q&A he indirectly heard that there was some interest.

Really though Suay Chin are already well in the money on their investment so with the remainder why not drip a little in each tax year as the company grows in value?

PS so far this morning 4 million shares traded.

Mikb, have you looked at how many shares we trade per day!

A drop in the ocean very orderly selling.

Mikb mainly (Rotter for interest) all as I said May 12th investor meet in Q&A past half way.

Interesting though one thing I missed and can't remember seeing it on here about the loan facility.

The offtake and floor price postponed until January 2026 - part of this deal was a prepayment for production. Due to the offtake not being fully completed it was replaced with the loan facility.

We are all fairly sure the offtake and floor price are part of the government discussions and maintaining arms length transactions etc.

Mikb the Suay Chin RNS evidences what Bernard said was correct.

It doesn't provide evidence that they were not selling in an orderly fashion, so how do you explain that?