Member Info for labrat99

Must they? Has that well produced much gas to warrant the expense?

Why not provide some evidence to back this up then? Should be easy. On the RCC site map there is no pipeline running through the Stockdale field that I saw.

Thanks for that Upside, so as suspected the Stockdale field has zero gas production and therefore no infrastructure. So it is going to require costly gas infrastructure to be installed before any production is possible. Can see why there was no mention of this in the rns, cannot see it being economical unless more wells have this zone present.

Upside do you know the well api number for the Stockdale lease oil well? Had a look on the RCC map there are not many gas wells in Wilson country so suspect the infrastructure is limited for gas production. If the actual well can be located it will be interesting to see if there are other gas wells nearby. Do you know if any of the nearby operators produce gas or have a pipeline?

Note the new zone has not even been tested. Note there was no mention of the nearest gas pipeline, hope its close, sure this was just an oversight by Eddie not mentioning this. Note two SWD at Stockdale, must be expecting a lot of costly water to dispose of. Four wells on line in six months, go team. No holding these boys back, storming away.

Eddie spent $400k installing gas infrastructure at SC current production zero, total production not much higher The roke "discovered" two new zones at SC, months of talk of perforating etc and nothing ever came of those. No wonder the market is once again unimpressed. Four wells on line in six months. That's the actual progress to date.

Agree Upside, still only giving short time frame for any results. Some of these wells have been completed since November, yet no results longer than 24 hours have been given. Most seem to be 6 hours. The RCC data will be interesting. Market unimpressed with the "results".

Cannot say things like this, its a great rns with a massive increase in production. Ignore the fact that it was an uncontrolled kick and will in no way reflect the stabilised rate. Some people have to ramp their trades.

Yawn.

Its a poor rns giving the figure from a gas kick is pretty ordinary. Another limited test, 6 hours this time. Well shut in to allow pressure to build does not sound very promising.

No the owner of the SWD is a kindly chap and is allowing them to use his disposal well for free.

Good to see you have arrived at a more realistic price finally Mr Jennings.

"Pick the number per BOPD of water total costs." Nothing there that states I had to stick with previous responses. Picked a number as requested and you are unhappy with it. Should have clarified these restrictions earlier.

Yep that proves that I never said it would be $2.5 well done. Are you for real.

Yes MYN are notorious for emitting pertinent information, actual physical disposal costs and any fees to the SWD owner. The $2.5 cost was provided by you in a link, I have never claimed this. You asked me to give a figure and are upset when provided with one. Diddums. Agree you are a joker, moving the goalposts. Pointless agreeing to not post on the board anymore when one party has multiple ids Mr Jennings.

$.80-$1 per barrel. The rns has to include the pumping costs and any fees or on going costs to the owner of the SWD. The loser pays �100 to a charity of the winners choosing.

Define what you mean by all in to dispose water. Is that everything including the cost of pumping to the SWD, pumping into the SWD and the fee to the SWD owner? �100 to charity of the winners choosing, money where mouth is.

How much does it cost to pump the water the third of a mile to the SWD? How much does it costs to pump the water into the well? How much is the owner of the SWD charging per barrel? You can ask a friend.

What's the matter has your pathetic attempt to point score with the mobile plant back fired? Diddums. Read the mining plan its a long document (although it does have some pictures) it will improve your understanding. Then you will not have to rely on other s to provide your information. Conveyors or trucks, did not answer. It will be closer to $2.5 than zero, the SWD owner will be wanting to make a profit as pretty sure they are not a charity, add in the pumping costs etc all adds up.

Is this the same people that told you disposal cost were zero, I would stop listening to them. Not sure why you would say they have trucks when you have agreed with AJamesW that they have conveyors on hand. Which is it trucks or conveyors make up your mind. Chopping and changing story is making you look very foolish. Not once have I disputed that Petroteq have this in hand, they have submitted a viable plan to the Utah state government that includes hiring equipment and operators . What I have clearly stated is that the mobile plant is not on site because the equipment is not there to provide the raw materials which was your original question.