Member Info for labrat99

AJamesW another one that has not bothered to read the mining plan. They are not using conveyors. I am sure you can provide a link to back this claim up. Would not want to accuse you of making things up.

The heavy equipment that they plan on hiring. Are you claiming they have hired equipment sitting idle at Asphalt ridge costing money. Or do you realise that the equipment will be hired when they need it. Making a fool of yourself.

You did notice that that is the excavator that feeds the material into the plant. Excavator and trucks to transport the raw material to the plant. Keep trying, good at posting links that do nothing to support your argument. How are the stripped oil sands going to get to the mobile plant, oil sands fairies still seem the most viable current option.

First there was no excavator, now you have noticed them, well done genius. There is also a crane in the video is that still there or were they hired for the construction of the plant? Really not doing very well here at all.

Upside provided a link a few months ago that provided a wealth of information on Asphalt ridge including detailed mining plans. Clearly your lacklustre research did not include reading these, hence the posts from a position of ignorance. One of these documents included costing's for hiring heavy equipment and operators to run them. You should read them as you are looking foolish.

The mine is not operating, pretty straightforward. How does the stripped oil sands get to the plant, the oil sands fairies deliver it perhaps. Or will an excavator and a truck be required? Does not make an economic sense to hire these until the operation is up and running. You continue to have a nightmare here with this rubbish. Any negatives?

Really are a bit dim. The mine is not operating so why would the plant be there. Second time this has been pointed out, will it sink in this time? Are you expecting a mobile plant to be sitting idle for months when it could be used elsewhere then moved when the mine is up and running. Any negatives?

Pointing out your misleading lies is not negativity and providing a bit of balance to all the ramping. If they manage to increase the production at forest hill then should make money, but it is certainly not without risk. Never once seen you mention any potential negative for this stock, why is that?

What a bizarre statement to make, why would I sell because you do not know about disposal costs. Makes no sense, breathe anger is making you say silly things now.

Pretty sure its more than zero:) How much does it cost to pump the water the third of a mile to the SWD? More than zero? The odd dollar per barrel to dispose of 200+ bpd is clearly more than a side issue. Clueless, absolutely clueless.

Only poster showing anger is yourself when the flaws in your statements are repeatedly pointed out. It has been amusing watching you flounder and posting links that actual counter your claims, comedy gold. If Deloro issue a tranche of new shares to fund the requirements then this will have an impact on MYN stake will it not? Having a nightmare here mind imo.

Do you actual believe this? Would not trust him to change the oil in my car never mind anywhere near an oil well. Was an expert on Mexico before closing last account as well. Never stopped going on about Achar, who turned out to be a total dud.

Page 18 once again disapproves everything you are saying. MYN are using some one else well ie a commercial SWD and the figures given are $.50 to $2.5 a barrel depending on supply and demand. MYN have little supply with only one well available. The figure you have plucked from nowhere will not even cover the costs of pumping the water to the SWD. The upper zone produced 14 barrels of water for every barrel of oil. Clearly this is going to have an significant impact on the economics, especially as production declines and water rate increases.

Well if you do not even know something as simple as the water rate from the test then clearly you are in no position to comment on the economics without this vital fact. You can see this yes.

Was wrong it gets better. What was the rate of water produced per barrel in the test?

It gets better, this is highly amusing. Quit while you are behind. Will give you a hint, how many barrels of water are produced per barrel of oil.

The fact that you think water disposal has little effect on the commercial production of the well is a laughable statement and demonstrates that you clearly do not have a clue about this. Its even more laughable than claiming that the cost would be zero.

Well done you have successfully highlighted the point. MYN are using a third party ie someone else well and do not have a homegrown recycling system. So $2.50 a barrel it is then.

Where is this research then? How much is the owner of the well charging per barrel? Management do not even state it is no problem, they call it manageable. So it clearly is a problem. Making things up you said zero. So as correctly pointed out this was a blatant lie that you knew to be untrue, so are these "sources" lies as well.

Little or zero cost is a blatant lie. They are using someone else well and will be charged for using it. Suggest you do some research on the disposal well market in Texas or maybe contact the company and ask how much they are getting charged per barrel. Management have stated they expect it to be "manageable" hardly sounds like no problem does it.