RE: repay circa $100M RCF b/ 21st11 Mar 2019 14:17
Hi E121,
I did not write that production guidance will be revised. Just wrote than in 2019 any production data reported will be slightly below the lower limit of the range, i.e. 63K. I went for 61K.
I continue to believe that repaying the circa $100M earlier than when its due in April could do wonders to the SP...
As far as shale you are the top dog here, as you follow such companies. Your views are interesting, and I am not going to disagree with your shale production forecasts.
I am however a believer that the majors being there is a good thing. They have a capital budget to allocate: they could use to move ahead with projects that take long to come to fruition (deep offshore drilling, frontier exploration, etc). By allocating capital to shale they will allocate less to these other projects. But, with the current pessimistic views on the role of oil in 2 decades from now, smaller companies will have a harder time to raise capital, so such long-term projects will slow down, and many will never go ahead. In short, the majors moving into shale will lead to less conventional oil exploration and production. What we have is a partial substitution effect here (more shale and less conventional oil production). So, we will witness an increase of the total oil production quickly, but it will plateau in 2 years time.
Demand growth is still healthy: US demand up 0.5M in one year, China now importing 11Mbopd (even if it is increasing exports of distillates and fuel), and other developing countries with very large populations (India, Indonesia, Nigeria, Turkey, Mexico) will be consuming more oil. So, I very much doubt demand will decrease.