Member Info for KonarA

"CICC won't relist until the first 2 IPOS are listed" What makes you so sure of this, have you had it confirmed? If CICC are short on cash to pay for the advisors, which they may be (as Jarada and Balfour haven't yet paid the money), then the re-listing may well be to raise money pre ipo's.

S_s I'm not sure if you missed my point, so I will clarify in case. I didn't say CICC are not eligible for the LSE, I said with a standard listing they are not eligible for the FTSE indices. FTSE is not LSE. LSE is not FTSE.

The FTSE 350 isn't a market, its an index. I don't know how accurate the RNS was, but CIC states a Standard Listing, which are of course not eligible for the FTSE indices.

http://www.global-mining-finance.com/gmf-spring/presentations2014/VSAcapital-GlobalMiningFinance.pdf

http://www.global-mining-finance.com/ So if you sit and watch the animated list of sponsors long enough, you will see the CIC Group Limited logo come around. Similarly if you click on the List of Attendees you will see us listed there. Interesting to see who one of the headline speakers were at the April Spring conference: http://www.global-mining-finance.com/gmf-spring/ Seems to me like CIC and VSA may have had a little meet up after the spring conference and did some business. It's also worth noting that another key player presented (and name checked us) at the November 2013 conference. http://www.global-mining-finance.com/newfrontiers/presentations2013/Crowe.pdf

number of shares in company x share price = market cap (value of the company) the vehicle by which you trade the shares doesn't really effect this. If the number of shares stays the same, then the share price will very quickly be dictated by what the open market values the company. But as Sence2 says, if we relist on a new market... that will initialy be a reflection of an independent valuation of the company. Its been speculated previously (though i have seen no evidence to confirm) that Ernst Young are carrying out valuations on CICC holdings. If these did go ahead, and were favourable, that could have beenn the catalyst for the decision to go for a main board listing. In other words... SB may not have wanted to disclose the value of the holdings whilst listed on AIM, as he knew fine well that the market had insufficient liquidity to respond accordingly to the news.

I'm confused why you can't disclose these "rumours" if they came to you outside of CICC circles. Unless its just usual hot air...

Have you ever watched Mystery Men? The Sphinx: He who questions training only trains himself at asking questions. The Sphinx: To learn my teachings, I must first teach you how to learn. The Sphinx: When you care what is outside, what is inside cares for you. The Sphinx: When you can balance a tack hammer on your head, you will head off your foes with a balanced attack. The Sphinx: Your temper is very quick, my friend. But until you learn to master your rage... Mr. Furious: ...your rage will become your master? That's what you were going to say. Right? Right? The Sphinx: Not necessarily.

They don't... its called CIC.. don't know how you got an alert saying CIC Capital??

http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20140507-911279.html

different company

I think its more that they would have to pay up the contract rather than being locked in. But thats just an assumption on my part.

Someone posted the other day that appointing a replacement Nomad would have tied us in to AIM for 12 months. I guess SB took the decision to delist rather than wait 12 months to make a main market move. A sponsor isn't a Nomad, it is a specific list of London Stock Exchange members that are approved by the FSA, and advise on the listing process. http://www.fca.org.uk/your-fca/documents/ukla/sponsor-list

"The Board believes that a move to a standard listing would be in the interest of all shareholders." The clues are there afaiac http://www.londonstockexchange.com/companies-and-advisors/main-market/companies/primary-and-secondary-listing/listing-categories.htm

Assumedly a Nomad would require a 12 month contract, and so breaking that contract with a main market listing would result in CICC having to pay up the contract? Its worth remembering (as Joe Y pointed out the other day) it is only an assumption on our part that CICC was "unable" to appoint a Nomad. All the activity leading up to the deadline appeared to be "business as usual". I'm like you - in that i can't decide whether to believe this or not. If we fundamentally believe that SB will achieve all the IPOs, then it is only a small step to believing that a Main Market listing is possible. I don't believe the derampers that suggest nefarious intent. But I do wonder if SB has taken on more than he can manage. I'd like to think the legion of CICC advisors will start to really earn their money.

Don't beat about the bush mate... say what you think. ;-)

We all know that this share is in a very precarious position. We (not you) all recognise the fact that we stand to lose money. The positives i have posted are to try to recognise that, at the moment, it is not a fait accompli; and to try to offer crumbs of hope to fellow holders. You on the other hand, seem to be hell bent on creating as much anxiety in others as possible. Its pretty low to say the least. You could always "justify" your actions in the past, with "only trying to protect people from rampers". But that is certainly not the case now. You're showing your true colours... and they are pretty rotten.

"Will the penny never drop for you? Will you be a believer for ever, no matter what?" I don't live in a world of diametric extremes.

The legal issues raised in that Globe and Mail article were all fully disclosed in the AIM Listing Documentation. I'm assuming that the article wasn't a surprise to you either, considering you will have at least read that document prior to investing? As for the press speculation as to his relationships with Mongolians.. the press also reported that a former Mongolian Prime Minister attended his wedding. So press can work both ways. With regards to Sence2 and Share_sharks relationship with SB... ICGAF. Only you and your cronies are obsessed with that long standing war. Their opinions mattered next to nothing on my decision to invest or not. In fact the only persons opinion who ranked lower.. well i'll let you decide that.

So you invested in CICC, but didn't believe SBs lies and dreams? Or are you saying you believed posters on here, that believed SB's lies and dreams?? Either way..