RE: _Overreaction7 Mar 2020 21:24
Doddle
"The NMC simply provided a contractual guarantee in case of non-payment or default in case companies owed by related parties weren't able to meet their contractual obligations to credit providers. These balances were approx $335m at the end of the year. Nothing unusual if you think about it, companies do it all the time. The only problem is that this hasn't been approved by the board and contingent liability as they call it disclosed in the notes to the accounts. Normally those disclosures give the users of the accounts an estimate of the potential financial effect and better understanding of any associated risks. This doesn't, by any means, mean that the company owes $335m. As long as the entities owed by the related parties pay their debts, which they are, there is basically no financial impact. The facilities will also "no longer be made available for further supplier financing" so no future impact possible. It could be as simple as a guarantee and support for the smaller entities with no sufficient credit rating & cash flow available in order to enable them to grow quicker & operate on the higher level. There is no mention of any defaults & inability to pay obligations by those businesses. They may as well be operating successfully and running at a profit. Plus their stock is under lock down, which can be used to pay for any potential debts. Obviously the guarantees should have been approved by the board & disclosed in accordance with the Listing Rules."
I wrote that. Thanks for "quoting" me I guess....
KOH