RE: Opening Price26 Feb 2020 20:22
The Committee and the Review Advisers are investigating these matters and seeking to determine the materiality of the discrepancies." How the company's auditors did not pick this us is amazing!
___
Auditors don't guarantee that the financial statements are 100% correct & error / fraud free, they provide a certain level of assurance based on the samples tested. They don't check every transaction. The key word in that sentence is "materiality", this is noting unusual to have discrepancies in the accounts especially in the large companies. Again, materiality is the key. If if it's less than 1-2% of the total assets, 0.5%-1% of total revenue or 5-10% of profit before tax it would be considered immaterial and auditor's opinion wouldn't even have to be modified. That 335m is not automatically owed, it was just a guarantee in case of non-payment, and "the facilities will no longer be made available for further supplier financing with the aim that the relevant balances should be unwound in line with existing terms". CEO got sacked, clearing the deck continues. Heads have to roll. Good. The sooner the better. This can only be a good thing in the long run. Accounts have to be delayed by default, and trust me when they are published they will be correct. All that nonsense is already included in the price anyway. Market may overreact as it always does but this won't last forever.
KOH