Member Info for KNIGELK

Understood and let's put the matter to bed... the only email which I have which refers to the BB comment etc was dated 5th August and again I acknowledge I was not the only one complaining to the company at that time and over a number of months before/after. I'm sure we are both pleased the company either acted on it and got a result - LSE decided to ban him/her or King simply decided to no longer post... please also note (and it's not an excuse) my memory isn't great so I understand if you get confused/annoyed with some of my posts so will endeavour to be more accurate in future and acknowledge we are all (?) here to support the company as shareholders gl

Just found the post u refer to and a) i do not mention Totally b) that it was the truth that i did contact her and she was going to contact the Nomad. At the time i had a right row with GRQ because i would not cut and paste the emails because a) they were confidental b) i was unsure whether Wendy would approve c) unsure of LSE rules especially as i gad warnings already and d) didnt want to give poster the heads up. He knew i and others were not happy with his posts and woild contact the company. Also its possible your emails to Wendy were at a diff time as he was posting misinformation for months. The only error in the Fitb post is that i should have mention others were also contacting her so apologies for that (although i do not mention Totally)

BTW I will look to see if I still have the emails but from memory she was going to discuss the matter at the next board meeting... what did happen afterwards was that he slowed up on his posts and then a few months later stopped posting completely - also I do not like my honestly questioned again and again by you. GRQ - Nottspie - Cashking etc can all vouch I have been posting here for over two years and probably 3-4 thousand posts have just been on Totally - you can believe it or not believe it - but I am feeling targeted for some reason... so stop please..

What I cannot be 100% sure of is whether it was my emails to her that made her contract the NOMAD - or your emails - or a combination (more likely) of a number of complaints made to her and BB comments here and on Advfn... I am sorry if it appears on FITB that I was trying to claim credit - I was trying to give an example and no one seemed to care over there anyway as it is still going on!

I did email Wendy on several occasions about certain posters including King75 and the comments they were posting. She did say she would speak to the NOMAD - and to be honest I cannot recall whether you were posting here at the time and did the same - although I was not the only one reporting posts to LSE as well.... the comment I was trying to make over on FITB (and not sure why you still follow me around the threads) was simple - if you trash a company you may get yourself in trouble and I gave an example and also mention an oil company (name I could not recall) that had taken legal action a few months ago.. I told you I do not go back though my 1000s of posts made here to be 100% sure my views appear contra and tbh I am also miffed that you do!!!

Still here.. just viewing the posts on and off and will start posting proper when results are out probably mid June imo gla

Yep bad results and a placing at 120p (what a surprise)... I think i'll stay away for the time being !!

Nothing really changes here... a £4 million loss for 2014... the only hope is that this is it with regards to contract losses and writedowns but I am not dipping my toes back in until it's obvious the company is in heading the right way again ..

Might reinvest here later this week considering the final results are due soon and the interims suggested a turnaround gla

Good recovery recently and hopefully those who stuck with DQE will be rewarded .. must be honest and admit did not get in on the low but took a small holding today and have a feeling the share price could get back to 12p - 15p which will do me... I do recall DQE was over 20p not that long ago gla

Well I definitely would not be a new investor at this level but there has been no sellers hence why the share price has held up so well... tomorrow is key - will some finally do some profit taking?

Interesting.. will look later and try to work it out!

Thank you for the summary... hopefully there is no need for any placing in the foreseeable future in view of the low share price??? My first thought was that the share price appears oversold but thanks again for giving reasons behind the drop..

Thanks - always liked this company so might reinvest but will review over the weekend... maybe the share price will recover on the next accounts gl

How on earth did the share price drop so much recently? Just been reviewing old share holdings to reinvest and DQE stands out - will obviously DYOR but can anyone here give a brief reason for this please? gla

There's been too many failures on AIM recently... and shocks... I think I invested here briefly about a year ago when I was more active as a trader (would have to get on to my HL account to be sure). Not sure of the posting history but AIM shares attract posters who either over ramp or troll/deramp... it's the posters who can see though the agendas and DYOR that succeed although sometimes you cannot foresee a suspension or loss of a NOMAD etc... I hope shareholders get something back here gl

Sorry to hear this for shareholders as the last time I reviewed this share matters will looking a bit more hopeful.. as for anyone promoting this share for x number of years - the least they can do is admit they got it wrong gla

..just before the 100001th ("joke") fund raising imo... dead cat bounce possible though....

Would need to some research first but if I recall - DCD has a majority shareholder so the share price can move on low volume... tbh surprised it has not been delisted so maybe plans in the works??

Not looked in for a while and pleased to note the share price recovery and sentiment change... might reinvest soon if the outlook is improving after years of static gla