Member Info for KingofClangers

CTC. Although thinking back, and it's a long time ago, I seem to recall TW slating Worthington so I can't be too critical about his stance there. There's been plenty of others though.

Deffo CTC. I didn't know that about TW. The so called sherrif of AIM. Strikes me that he's probably another cog in the whole pump and dump cartel which seems to operate quite freely in a so called regulated market.

CTC. Correction, Tim Lyle resigned the same time as Biggar from Whetstone. It was David Papworth who resigned from the BOD of Whetstone before those two. He, funnily enough, is on the BOD at City and Merchant with Tim Lyle. The City and Merchant link is that ACF is an appointed representative of City and Merchant.

I'm not saying there's owt dodgy going on here at EUA but I'm uncomfortable that the EUA BOD use ACF who have an association with Lyle and Papworth who were involved with Whetstone. I can't see them being brought to book for Whetstone as it wasn't even listed, shares were traded through Britdaq from memory until they pulled the plug. I'd like to see Biggar, Ware, Spurway and Earley get some time for Worthington though.

CTC. It's the 'peeing in the same pot' aspect to it which bothers me. Although, more fool me, I didn't sell when I found out the connection and the SP was about 30p. I'd like to say you live and learn, but in my case I don't think I do.

Incidentally, I believe one of the charges laid against the Worthington crew is making misleading announcements to the market. And that was a main listed company at the time. A stark warning to anyone who regards RNSs as gospel..

Ian,

Re: The Date Game. On 20 July 2021, I had everyday for the next two years. Am I still down for that? :-)

SteJSteJ. It was more of a wind up as opposed to 'attacking' you. I was referring to your one liners where you might respond, 'No it isn't' or 'Yes it is'.

My reference to ACF was that Tim Lyle is basically behind this company, or was the last time I checked companies house. The reason I mention that is he was on the BOD at Whetstone Capital, an incarnation created after the Worthington Group debacle. Whetstone has become another pile of dog poo after fanciful claims of potential deals etc. Anyways, Tim Lyle was on the Whetstone BOD at a similar time to Alan Biggar (although he did resign before Biggar). Biggar is up in court later this month charged with fraudulent trading.

Now I'm not saying Tim Lyle is anything to do with that but what I can safely say is he was on the board of Whetstone where investors have seen there shares disappear into nothin of any value whatsoever. Does it bother me he is involved in ACF, damn right it does.

SteJSteJ. If it's a picture of me burying my head in the sand you want, you're not going to get it.

A year or so back though I did point out who was behind the BOD's ramping machine, ACF. I thought that was pretty good.

M. Turner. Just remind me what the company actually owns?

M.Turner. Another apologist for this sham of a BOD. Anyway, I wasn't asking you. But while you're here, point me to any content you have provided which has been useful. Thanks in advance.

The BOD is being paid their best...

SteJSteJ,

Were you the kid at school who used to say, 'I know you are, I said you are. But what am I?', when someone called you a name?

An RNS last year said 'shortly'. It's pretty reasonable if people take what they say with a pinch of salt.

Surely the number of experts on the payroll might have worked out that any potential buyer might want to know what they are buying at the outset? Why not get the brochure ready beforehand?

I'd take 2bil right now. This afternoon. :-)

Owt 'biblical' or 'incoming' to report these days Tilly, or is it all just doom and gloom at the moment?

Sorry TBOT. I got distracted and didn't reread what I'd typed.

What regulatory caveats could prevent the options being exercised in the current circumstances?

TBOB. Sorry to put re-ask on this thread but, what regulatory caveats could prevent the options being exercised in the current circumstances?

What regulatory caveats could prevent the options being exercised in the current circumstances?

DR. They can exercise the options regardless of what they do / do not know. They are options.

If they don't take them up then I would view that as a negative because, I think we can all agree, they know more than us.

The only possible way I think them not taking them up could be a positive would be if a buyer had made it a condition that they don't.

Lol. Basically an admission that the BOD's proclamation of being unaffected by sanctions is a load of crap.

My memory goes back well before the SMO. The BOD with help of the NOMAD pumped the price to ensure a higher level of funding in the middle of last year. It was *******s. They didn't have a sale and the buyer could well have been Bob down the road for all we know thanks to the bullshine NDAs. Get real.