Member Info for Kenirogas

All the best, bud...

I think the "for now" applies to many....

Good luck, would be a shame to lose your input...

You still in?

"Good luck everyone"....

"Targeting 250bopd"....

I would hope we are at 10x that by end of H1 2019, even without another Major tie up...

Worlds apart in terms of progress?

#dreamstate

Maybe the relaunch will be so big we'll go straight to the Ftse 100

Both sides have suggested culprits, both been countered with more or less valid rules/guidelines of

ii's dont have to declare until 5%, which is 785 million I believe, so plenty of room for an undeclared ii to be selling on even if not Outrider related.

As for provoking discussion, you seem to be after much more than that Gippy, and re-reading you first post, it was definitely phrased more as an accusation against ZZ/SN than a genuine query.

Suggest we all agree to disagree, and believe what we choose.

Absolutely Linandy, Cayman rules...

The reuters holder? not having to declare? different entities under one roof, all with (possibly) fingers now caught in the til?

No wonder they are not declaring sales for shares they're not meant to have, especially if FRR can prove it.

Just saying its not necesarily the end of a dream, chap, but thx for unearthing the doc.

Who knows, maybe thats the final precursor to another announcement which may include us?

GLA

SBP: re: no mention of NUOG

Surely whoever they are working on a deal with ( and from the figures published they just have something in the wings),, surely that would have to be a mutually agreed press release timed to suit both markets. I would certainly never expect it to be part of a more general (and largely historical) statutory requirement publication.

And if/when it comes, the surely it would be MFDevCo on the docs, not Nuog?

...i forgot to mention the much more significant dilution factors with those other, but I think you get the picture

Thx Insidious, I did a bit more digging after your post, but I only took the 2 year view.
In terms of differences to other companies, well...

MySQ..currently delisted
Prem...highs of .7 dropping to current .12 with the odd boince to the mid .2s

Not totally up with the others, but all have experienced significant spikes and subsequent falls. I think Seadogs post was highlighting the notion that many jumpers from here to there would have been trapped now at much lower levels.

Ok, so we are lacking comms, and who knows, this may spike and fall even on news, but at least AM chose to keep the Co going when he could have delisted back in the Enegi days,and mor importantly we are yet to have our spike.

Hopefully it will go well past 2p this time and be sustainable.

Pick you own exit strategy, and thx, Seadog.

I think suspension, per Seadogs posts, would depend on whether the disclosure means we break any AIM qualifying rules.

Unless we can volutarily suspend to let the market re-assess value?

Assuming there is a link, I would hope so...simultaneous RNSs?

Otherwise, its back to "hurry up and wait"

Quick reminder: LT expects to be very happy by the agm, but thats not til mid jan?

Only 3p/lt difference here in Cornwall, mate.

But when you run an old T4 on waste veg oil at £10/60 lt from the local friendly pub, it doesnt really matter :-)

And thanks for all your balanced posts over the last couple of years. You seem to hold back until the reaction to news (or not) has died down...I salute you

And always remember. Santa's a Scotsman!

And yet the last report from said holder (who is now an insider and therefore unable to trade), was that he is veryhappy with his holding in this "dog" and expects to be even happier by the agm...

And that after a meeting with AM. You pays your money...

Well your analogy seems to adhere to the idea that there are two opposing teams here.

The question is, do they both actually want to play the same game, or is one team "throwing" the game to win a side bet?

How do you view that Frank?

Surely a money source is unlikely to be us unless it is via a production boost?

Easily found in the MOU rns Mike...

"The MOU will remain in force and effective until 26 September 2019 and may be terminated by either side giving 30 days' notice. "

BH must be pretty sure of a good outcome if we can boot them out at any time, surely?

At your age mate, I'd take it without complaining

LMOA