Member Info for keeptofacts

always look for the simplest answer, in all thngs.

if appraisal is the obvious thing to do but 'we are not in the business of well appraisal' the simplest answer is someone else is in the business of well appraisal.

and there it is, the subtle deramp :)

clear as glass :)

surely it's the equipment, not the explosives that need to come in.
surely Schlumberger would have all the explosives they need in country already.
they expected to need to stimulate, just not with the heavy duty kit.
I am assuming it's not like a rifle where only 1 caliber round fits the chamber.
maybe someone with on the ground experience could confirm or not.

seriously?
why would you bother asking.
this is a complete t&sser who made up a'inside information' about a meeting for all sound staff after Christmas.
subsequently denied outright by the bod.
the guy is clearly a fantasist at best.

we will not drill TE11.
drilling complete on TE10.
we have a month or so whilst we wait for results.
seems very odd that we wouldn't crack on wth TE11 whilst we waited.
short of discussing pottential offers, I can't see what would cause management bandwidth issues sufficiently to stop at the very least ground works starting at TE11.

thanks for sharing this crude.

he's also a proven lier, remember the 'meeting for all staff' after Christmas?
what a moron!
filter or ignore

there's a hell of a lot mor ewho wouldn't
hope this helps.

what pathetic individuals.
250 showing her true colours again I see too.

getting no flow doesn't take long.
conversely, getting a flow requires a period of time to determine the average flow rate, rather than the initial flow rate.
ergo, I believe the longer it takes the better, within reason.

all three drills are fully funded, but of course you know that.

combine the fact that they were able to do te10 groundworks whilst drilling te9 and the fact that jp directly said any delay is likely to be because he wants one (or words to that effect) and the picture becomes clear.
:

i have found in the past posts get removed that are harmless, simply because they reply to a post that was not acceptable.
hammer to crack a nut springs to mind.

that I welcome a rising sp more because the t*ssers p!ss off than for the increase in portfolio value.

most of the negative t&ssers will be possitiev as soon as they get their buy in price

read Echo rns?
completely irrelevant to Sound, however much the likes of you want to persaude otherwise.

'colourful language'?
Funded Feasibility Study isn't colourful in my world.

albeit I missed off the !

get a grip ffs.

echo had no moveable hydrocarbons
we have already identifed moveable hydrocarbons a returned a sample to surface!

is that 'sp should be' or 'I hope sp is'?

:)

so, let's get this straight

you bought ay 38p, but have been in 'this pile pof shite' for years.
really?
may I ask why you didn't bail at a profit then?
the only time you could have bought at 38p was either 2018 or before 2016.
the former hardly quaifies as years and the latter gave you serveral years to get out with a decent profit.