Member Info for keeptofacts

.....

I haven't posted a word about brexit (till this post)
wtf are you on about?

would a CEO write the below if he wasn't seriously confdent about TE10?

"multiple steps to establish the commercial potential of this exciting discovery at TE-10."

exciting discovery!

are you thick, or do you thing everyone else is?

when I last looked Tendrara wasn't a producing field!
it's called exploration for a reason.

if I don't like a company or the information they are sending out, I don't invest.
or, if I've been stupid enough t invest without enough research, I sell.

what I don't do, is waste my life moaning about the company.
THAT would be stupid.
hope this helps.

thanks Exploration

“Discovery

The term applied to a petroleum accumulation/reservoir whose existence has been determined by its actual penetration by a well, which has also clearly demonstrated the existence of moveable petroleum by flow to the surface or at least some recovery of a sample of petroleum. Log and/or core data may suffice for proof of existence of moveable petroleum if an analogous reservoir is available for comparison.

that seems very clear (and positive) to me!

understand that we didn't see any tubing or perf guns mobilised fr TE9, but we are for TE10,
what does that tell you?
for the thick or disingeneous IT TELLS YOU THERE IS SOETHING WORTH STIMUATING.

remember Schlumberger are paying for most of this, they wouldn't throw money at a well that wasn't worth it.
They (Schlum) don't NEED this to work.

yes

ingest = infest, but there's an appropriate feel about ingest as they do feed on bbs :)

all flow rate information in one go after stimulation.
I personally am pleased that is the case as it will stop the scum who ingest bbs trying to twist informatrion to their own ends,.

if you don't believe me, ask the company,

don't be rediculous.

.

think you're looking at the wrong stock.
largest 'sells' are two of 85,000 (less than £20k) which look like bed and isa to me.
otherwise a total of less than 300k shares sold (not even £70k total)

what utter tosh.

so there is "an underlying issue that the majority don't see."

yet "causing shareholders to sell into each and very sp rise"

you can't have it both ways :)

this is AIM and additionally O&G exploration on AIM, between well results. if you are surprised that the sp is languishing (actually very well supported @ 100% up off lows) then you must be new to investing.
or more likely you're another wannabe trader.

hope this helps

yes, traveling for sure

at the moment,
anyone know where/why?

are you seriously extrapolating running costs during a drilling campaign for the period after the drilling finishes?
pray tell what you expect sound to spend a million a month on when they are not drilling?

ignore previous post, been a long day!

obviously your 'bond' is the asset AFTER gsa.

duh, time to swap coffee for beer

Bill,

if that is the case, the gsa negotiation should only take miniutes!
discount the future cashflows based on the prevailing interest rate of the currency in question.
as the 'bond' is unerwritten by the government the credit rating of the company is irrelevant.

Thanks Exploration.
that was the missimg part of the puzzle, they can't agree a price until they know the costs they have to carry.
makes sense.
why the hell can't sound just say that?