Member Info for Kando

Judging by the chart, a tranche at 31p on Tuesday, 30p yesterday, 31p today. All round numbers.

It's clearly an agreed price, by the way it snaps to it, and sticks with it. The algo trades are probably third party players taking advantage of the situation to sell on every tranche spike. Hence why the many algo trades don't add up to the underlying volume.

Must you disagree with everything T4G?

What part of a 30p share price trying to hold 28p makes you think there's much buying demand. You spent much of last year disagreeing that it would hit 35p. Has there been no selling pressure all the way down? Are shorts not increasing? Are brokers not slashing price targets? It's someone selling, otherwise the buyer wouldn't be picking them up off-book.

@t4g - Whoever is buying at these volumes needs a motivated seller, there isn't the liquidity for this quantity without spiking the share price through their own induced demand. If the seller wasn't motivated to sell, they wouldn't be selling this quantity at a price capped BELOW what was just last week, more or less, ATLs, they'd allow the buyer to take them at market rate - which at these volumes, as above, would elevate the share price. So they've agreed the sale price where the seller offloads huge volume without tanking the price while they're doing it, and the buyer takes that volume without exploding the price. Just because it's slightly above where the share price organically wants to be, doesn't mean there isn't a desperate seller behind it. Every sell is obviously someone else's buy, but this looks more, in my opnion, like a motivated seller than a particularly motivated buyer.

...and the only willing buyer that makes sense would probably be Ashley, given he often likes to accumulate holdings in anything retail circling the drain in the hopes of one day subsuming them into the empire.

Looks like someone dumping huge at an agreed price. Must be a willing buyer on the other side though.

"He can't let's us down 8 times.in a row.cam he ffs"

Morgan Freeman voice-over: "He can...and he did."

Canaccord Genuity downgrades Boohoo Group to 'sell' with a price target of GBP0.19.

https://www.investing.com/news/pro/boohoo-receives-investment-bank-analyst-rating-update-3189998

All right, I'll leave you all be.

Stand down, back to your posts. You're free to ramp each other to bits.

This the projection thread? 😂

"You really would think moulding would have saved a F U to the stock market for Tomorrow to celebrate 3 years of misery but think we all know that would be expecting too much from him"

Hush now Sheila, you'll start boring yourself again.

Sorry dangerous dave. Just doing my best Michael Burry impression. Entertains me.

strong opinions, weakly held.

it's matthew moulding you all ought to be upset with. it's not ****posters on forums that run the company or determine the share price.

few of you engage on the issues raised, all defensive and eager to make it personal. that reflects an emotional style of investing, not a pragmantic one. it's not a popularity contest. explain why the share price will go up from here without saying the words "capital event".

revenues in reverse, active customers plummeting, market share decreasing, still can't manage to make cash, already in net debt, deluded panglossian ceo who can't or won't be replaced, one division wholly written off, another (ingenuity) essentially dead in the water, stagnant and a capex blackhole. what part of inverted yield curves, sharply rising unemployment and consumer sentiment weakening makes you think thg is going to be priced more generously than it already is?

Too right, Dave.

Lol. If you say so. Between colleagues, friends, family, and ostensibly unquestioning or indifferent allies, he's not under any threat. See: his re-election at the AGM with 95.65% of the votes. That after delivering the shambles of a double digit yearly topline growth miss at just 60 days notice and half a dozen consecutive profit warnings.

"if someone wanted it they’d take it."

So what you're saying here is that no-one wants it. Which sums it up.

Nah ta.

That's fine Dave. Don't care what any of you invest in, no offence. I've never told anyone to sell. Merely discussing a company's fortunes on the company's lse thread, if you don't mind.

Just for future reference, if you use the "reply" button beneath a post, it allows you to contribute to an existing thread. You've, perhaps inadvertently, created 6 "Opinion" threads today.

What a difference years of mismanagement makes, huh.

Eh? The company is doing poorly. It's about to do even worse if there's a recession. Changing the CEO at this point is too little, too late. Any successor wouldn't have much time to right the ship to ride out any coming storm. It's academic anyway, he won't leave and he has enough control to block his removal. Whether you like it or not, you're stuck with him.

"based purely on interest rate trajectory and this is where there is a good chance you'll get caught out. Historical recessions from the start of a Fed hiking cycle is a mixed bag at best."

It's based on more than that Go. How many examples can you find of yield curve inversions not accurately heralding a recession, especially an inversion of this depth and duration? Recessions are only formalized in hindsight, some measures are already signalling that recession is already here. US Real GDI already turned negative and that almost always foreshadows a fall in GDP. Germany in recession already, the UK probably in or about to fall into one. Soft landing would be nice, but the indicators aren't favouring it.

But yeah, you're right, this is as much a THG specific issue. It's a growth stock that stopped growing under a CEO who can't help but mislead the markets and fail to deliver. It's a credibility issue over whatever ambitious narrative THG once had.