Member Info for Kando

Bollinger bands are getting very tight on the daily and 15 min charts. Big move looks to be imminent. Too close to 56p support to realistically hold that, so on the downside, 41p might be next test.

"Give it a rest Kando….you were wrong just own it."

By selling at £1?

Update is one of market share loss, revenue loss, and even more adjustmented figures. Returned to growth on a constant currency basis? What's the next accounting shuffle to sugarcoat the narrative? Revenue is still falling. It's a growth stock that stopped growing and is losing active customers (700,000 down in beauty, 300,000 in nutrition). That's the underlying business trend.

Invest if you like. Who cares. But take the rose tinted off.

Pump-and-dump

adjective INFORMAL

denoting the fraudulent practice of encouraging investors to buy shares in a company in order to inflate the price artificially, and then selling one's own shares while the price is high.

Creating more bag holders more like. The shorts are loading on this pump.

The 'ol pump before the dump again. How do they get away with it 🙄

Nej.

Bye. Sorry your feelings are hurt.

If it makes you feel any better, it's not just THG that looks bearish. It's the whole market. Try not to take it so personally.

Absolutely. Strong opinions, weakly held. Posted as much that I'd sold at a pound once the technicals flagged up ultra bearish in August. The results then confirmed it. Posted about that sell signal much to the chagrin of everyone here. What's your point? That I bought at 55p, sold at a pound and now think the market is still signalling that it wants to go much lower? Where's the credibility issue?

If you've got nothing better to than trawl through my posting history from 7 months ago, maybe you ought to spend more time on the charts yourself.

Oh man, that's so witty, you should tweet that!

Cheers for posting Oke.

"CAC has already risen to £26-27 per customer" - If that estimate is anywhere close to accurate, that's ridiculous. They're sprinting just to stand still.

"we believe any US growth could be margin dilutive and potentially put Boohoo in an ever worse position." - More or less the same prognosis as when they first attempted to break into the US then, an enterprise they should have ditched.

"spending more on marketing than any other listed peer (+600bps over eight years), while the recent sales performance has been the worst of all European listed eCommerce peers." - Speaks for itself. Not the sign of a company with any competitive advantage.

Oh T4G, there's just no need to argue. It's in the BoE data we've both posted. The hiking cycle started BEFORE 1979, but reached comparable tightening BY 1979. You go ahead and take everything literally. It ain't gonna change facts or the reality of your Boohoo investment. You live in your land of make believe. You've shouted this stock up all the way down. Why stop now? Why stop at 13000 posts? Wouldn't want anyone else using this forum for useful discussion would we?

Good luck with your investment. But you are an exceptionally silly person.

The chart from 14th Sept to now looks very similar to 17th Aug to 13th of Sept. Teeing itself up for more of the same? One last pump before the big dump into next week.

Ah Bank of America, in for a good ol' pump and dump again. Pretend like everything Moulding said is true, everything rosy, corner turned, insane price target, just in time for a disappointing Q3 update to dump into. Not their first rodeo.

"Kando, I'd suggest you stop telling a bunch of stinking porkies. Interest rate rises were nothing like you posted below. Here's the link to the actual BoE data.

I don't argue with anybody, I just like to point out the lies posted by the uninvested to keep some balance on the board

https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/boeapps/database/Bank-Rate.asp"

You've literally reposted the data I posted to you, and claimed it's a lie. You are such a donkey, t4g. You're like chat bot from 1998. Even Clippy from Microsoft Word has better reading comprehension and analytical skills.

Are the BoE telling porkies? The rates set by the BoE in 1973, 1980, 1990 are as I said. Go argue with Andrew Bailey.

Good luck with your Boohoo investment. Donkey.

"when rates have never previously risen so aggressively" - What?

In the UK alone, rates rose from 4% to 15% in 1979, and from 6.5% to nearly 14% in 1989. There's been plenty of more aggressive rate hiking cycles in America. '79 was so aggressive it made Paul Volcker a household name.

You're immune to reality t4g. The data is there, but your insane obsession with Boohoo won't let you accept it.

You clearly are disputing it, else what is it you're asking, is it exactly 6 months? No, it is not likely to be EXACTLY 6 months. There is often a lag and on average, it's around 6 months, hence the ~... Now that means it can be longer or shorter, but there is often a lag, and averaged out, it is around 6-8 months.

Just for a change, why don't you just nod, go "huh, that's interesting" and not argue with every commenter on this board about things which are factually true and available for you to research YOURSELF. The links already posted show everything. Stop demanding explanations of others to fill in your lack of due diligence. It clearly isn't going to change your misplaced optimism in a fast fashion brand that went out of fashion at the wrong end of an economic cycle.

Sure, can do.

In the US:

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FEDFUNDS

1959, 1969, 73, 79, 89, 2000, 2006, 2018

In the UK:

https://www.resolutionfoundation.org/app/uploads/2019/09/Slide5.png

1973, 1980, 1990

etc, etc.

Aggressive hiking cycles to combat inflation inducing recessions is not a new thing. In fact it's by design. To beat down inflation central banks want to slow the economy.

Acting like this one is somehow different is naive, and contradicted by centuries of data.

Boom and bust, yes, but the busts of this cycle have only just started. Yield curves have been inverted longer and deeper than almost any other time, and they unerringly predict recessions. In tightening cycles, recesssions lag central bank pauses by ~6 months, and an outright pivot would signal the start of one. Central banks have only just (probably) paused. There is a big chunk of downside to come for equities in the next 6-18 months.

How sure are you that Boohoo isn't going to be one of the casualties of the bust part of the cycle? It's not looking too hot in the macro environment before the recession, how will it fare when unemployment starts to soar? How robust is the balance sheet?

Why would they buy shares in a company they have no faith in?

That they're not buying tells all you need to know about the company's prospects as viewed from within. If they thought it was a bargain at these basement prices, they'd buy. They clearly have "got a clue" enough to know not to.

Not even invested here. Who's upset?

You've been here for years shouting down realists. 13,000 angry posts. By most accounts a fairly tedious troll. But no one is upset. Engaging with you is like batting away a gadfly. The price of posting on the Boohoo LSE page.