RE: jlp22 Apr 2019 13:20
watched it all - 'our sister company Jubilee' - later on 'we can't call them a sister company because they have no connection'.
it's either, willamite, somethingite or dolomite and with a bit of practice you can tell the difference between the TWO.'
'It's so heavy anyone could recognse it' (or is it them?)
'We are not allowed to talk figures' and in the next sentence gives us the figures.
'THEY' are contractually obliged to process our stuff' - who are they? JLP I think but he isn't clear.
They have a phosphate deposit to sell, Newmont have been talked to about a gold/copper deposit JV, they have Star Zinc and the area closer to Kabwe which they are going to aggresively progress'.
he isn't interested in another offer which sort of might have been made he wants to develop it himself / themselves (Galileo) - neither he nor they have the money - he says so. They have only paid half of the £100,000 cash for the Zinc silicate project and not issued the millions of shares in Galileo which were part of the agreement - he needs money to drill the site and says a placement will be needed.
The dilution is going to be pretty bad - shares for the site purchase, shares for the drilling, shares for the company overheads, shares for the transportation and excavation equipment - then there will be warrants attached to draw in investors - we have seen this all run out at JLP - not going through all that again.
Wait until the first truck is loaded up and ready to send to JLP's plant (about 6 to 8 years I would guess if they can get the cash) before touching galileo. On the other hand - JLP can just carry on with Kabwe and do a nice little takeover when the JORC is done or sell the plant to Galileo when we have finished with it.
Galileo is good for JLP one way or the other - but Galileo is on a whim and a prayer IMO.
Caveate - you could make a nice profit from a pump and dump or two over the coming years.