Hands up who thinks that lse should...5 Feb 2021 08:17
have some kind of verification procedure and the opportunity for holders to filter out any and all posters that come from unverified accounts in one fell swoop ?? That would be the second holy grail following closely behind a mute switch for your the half lol
RE: That wasn’t bent at all now was it ? ...4 Feb 2021 08:32
i tried so hard and got no where but in the end it didn't really matter ! i almost fell and dropped my fone but in the end in didn't really mattterrrrrrr :)
RE: That wasn’t bent at all now was it ? ...4 Feb 2021 08:30
so i dont see number for the 11 mins from 8.00 till 8.11 ?? anyone with l2 ? can you see any trades during those minutes ? conveniently absent from the listings.
RE: That wasn’t bent at all now was it ? ...4 Feb 2021 08:24
be interesting to see the numbers for those two minutes !! Chances are it was more likely to trip out shorters than holders though thinking about it ! 30% profit and then buy back @ 27 ?? one would almost think the mm were in the boiler room granny robbers pockets! perish the thought :)
Lovely silver sun you say all “everyone’s views are allowed to be expressed in here “ and yet proceed to outline why you only subscribe to this opinion when it aligns with yours. All views are allowed but a group dynamic is individuals of a like mind expressing solidarity in their shared “ individual views” and that’s not allowed ?? I’ve been here since early last year but don’t play with the pirates , my choice, I personally see it as harmless and have never felt excluded because I don’t role play Jack sparrow! Then again I never wanted to be in a gang I wasn’t part of I’m literally a frustrated hermit ! Are you talking about me because I’m being uppity or are you deflecting because your abrasive nature often results in exclusion and you like it better when you instigate the exclusion? It’s then your choice :) I love how we humans convince ourselves we are above the fray whilst getting down and dirty in it don’t you ? :)
Well in case that’s the case I apologise for over reacting ! All I ever do is see what I see in the linguistics and put forward possibilities ! Not claims or definitive statements just possibilities as I see them ! I did the classic major premise minor premise conclusion which is a flawed and lazy philosophy and I’m a little bit disappointed in myself !
Wind your neck in moron ! I am speculating and suggesting what might have been the reason nothing more ! Whatever your problem apart from an over inflated ego is I have no idea but opinions muted in a discussion forum with plenty of caveats, are to most right minded people called a discussion . I guess you don’t fall into that category!! You say you were an advisor ! Based on that blinkered outburst I see why you said it past tense !
Options wouldn’t be affected I imagine apart from his inability to avail himself of them IF. He is party to information until after the fsp finished ! I am Probably wrong but the wording seemed to me the absolute minimum necessary to clarify eur position !! Only reason I see that they would be so frugal is something is covered by the nda one way or another ??? As for me I’m content and only annoyed it gave the mms a perfect chance to tree shake the h3ll out of us !! Just glad I gritted my teeth and ride it out :)
Or perhaps your all missing the screaming obvious ?? If a strategic employee was in the process of being transferred from the seller to the buyer but this could not take place whilst in possession of certain holding because of a conflict he would be terminated prior to a certain date and have to remove the conflict before making the move ! Also the move would be covered by the nda but not the sale ergo the sale rns would be necessary but no further info could be provided. It’s also possible that eur were not availing themselves of his services and so were unaware of a new position until after the sale rns but still not allowed to disclose his new position if his new employer or position was with the future buyer ! Or at least a company under the control of the nda ????? Either way wasn’t involved in the fsp by eur had no insider knowledge and could still be covered by the nda !! ? Maybe
well mac et al, in the words of the late great " scotty" from star trek " Any man who could perform such a feat, I wo'd na dare disappoint. She'll launch on time. And she'll be ready."
... i can handle this kind of excitement @ Cheltenham because its a lot less money and only lasts for about a minute ! This is relentless been ongoing for months and savagely blooming stressful at times. Be glad when its over and i can take a minute, drink the 50 year old napoleon i was going to toast rowka with and chill the f/out as the "yout" would say! :)
respect your views optimist but would it be churlish to suggest you leapt without thinking when you chose the moniker ? :) Purely empirical observation opinion only !