RE: Why25 Mar 2021 21:19
Lol @Dartron. Obv that wasn't intention
@HeatherSmall, it's a somewhat similar play as what JPM do with gold and silver. Basically it's not about driving the price of a stock up or down, that's irrelevant to them. What you want to be able to do is control a sufficient amount of the liquid stock to control the direction of the share price at any given point of time. i.e. you create a range that becomes predictable. The highs and lows are not exactly, but close enough guaranteed.
With regards to the wedge, I've quickly put that in a chart here for visual reference: https://www.tradingview.com/x/PcVsDWoT/ The top line shows the time to sell. There's a supporting resistance at ~240, otherwise it's down to the lower line. OK, this is an oversimplification that ignores other factors, but the point is that they can make 10-20% every couple of weeks. They don't care about the actual share price, they care about controlling it's movement and keeping it in these ranges.... this then gets frustrating for people who buy close to the highs, and also frustrating for fundamental investors who buy towards the lows but are anticipating a stronger play... and the reason this can happen is because there aren't enough regular investors in this stock (referred to as liquidity). With JPM being based in the US, they don't follow the standard reporting frameworks. And you can see via the holdings RNS on 12th Jan that they don't actually "own" the shares, they're just trading them. It's typical JPM
IF there is finally traction and the share price breaks through the ceiling (top line), which eventually happens as these wedges get closer to their end and the range becomes smaller, then the bank holds off, let's the rise take place (they profit from this too remember) and then start again once the rise has cooled off.
Again, I'm over-simplifying, but hopefully it gives an idea of what goes on
In my view, CAML could move to quarterly dividends and provide more off-the-cuff updates on strategic issues. This'd help reduce the cyclical nature of the play whilst also make shorting more risky for the big banks. I think these sorts of actions would have a stablising effect on the SP and help it rise... but, what do I know in the end?