RE: FCF / pension explanation from IR16 Mar 2026 16:56
What's everyone's thoughts on the fcf? Usually Helen from IR responds, but just noticed the last time was Stephanie. As others have pointed out on here, fcf could be eaten up by costs and some reports say the same.
Part of my email to IR said:
"I am worried about analysts views that the fcf that has been talked about is going to be eaten up with the pension debacle.
I know you put "The cash flow in 2026 is expected to be positive between £20-40m after a number of negative years – so that will be the first milestone", but reports from analysts think differently. Thank you for your responses so far."
Stephanie replied with what I put below:
"I think there may be some confusion between the two pensions businesses here. The difference between our free cash flow guidance of £20 - £40m and net debt movement is the costs associated with the closed book Life & Pensions business exit. This follows the agreement to hand back the remaining contracts in this space which was announced last year we’ve said this will be £100m over 5 years, front end loaded over the 5 years, but eliminating a major long term cash drag from the Gorup. The £20m - £40m free cash flow is inclusive of the CSPS contract."
So they see some costs from the closed book Life & Pensions business exits and that fcf £20m - £40m free cash flow is inclusive of the CSPS contract. So without the costs of the closed book Life and pensions, fcf would be higher.
I'm not sure what to make of things as one analyst now see's fcf as around £2 million I think it said.