Member Info for jonjo

And there we have it - the very valued comments of a barking mad id10t - Yee Ha grab the BOD and over the cliff we go. By the way and just out of interest who exactly pays someone to post on a BB - it always raises a chuckle with me when people (numpties) state that you are being paid to post this or that. Please do let me know who these fantastic paymasters are because I would be very happy to apply !!

Hi Paddy - heeey over there is a cliff - tell you what lets all jump off together Hurrah!!!! Now before we do that we need a name for our group Aaaah - let me see What is the group name for Lemmings?????

HB have a look at whats happening at GKP and you will see that post dilution and a deal having been done there people are very liable to be brought to account. So you tell me perhaps how do you propose to bring them to account prior to an EGM?? Do you honestly think that a majority of PI's are going to vote like turkeys and vote for Christmas - all hot air and huff and puff as it will never happen and that is a fact !!

What I am for is not throwing the toys out of the pram and I dont see anything sensible from you being posted on this BB - Boo Hoo the BOD stole my toys so I am not playing any more - lets wreck everything and teach them a lesson - Pathetic and try manning up for a change - Your petulance would teach no one any lesson and allow them to leave without being called to account !!!!

will do nothing and benefit nobody - if you want to make your feelings felt put in a vote of no confidence in the BOD at the EGM. Makes me laugh diddnt see many of the current posters turning up at the last meeting to vote down the BOD. This is all Huff and Puff about legal moves and voting No if you want to do something there has to be a company in place with an asset to fight in the first place otherwise a liquidation with lots of moaning will achieve nothing - FACT !!

Paddy - brilliant strategy - NOT let's all just throw in the towel and vote NO and then see the company in liquidation and lose all the assets in the process - or you could vote yes and then hold the BOD to account after the restructure along with the BH for manipulating the deal - or you could just berate people for poor spelling and try to be a smart 4rse

Hi CC I find it incredible the lack of knowledge or research here by some posters and whilst I understand the reasons why anything inviting any form of insolvency action simply means that the asset will disappear due to the terms of the licence. Any insolvency that is placed such as liquidation, administration, CVA automatically invokes con elation of the licence. Why do you think that the BH are putting in 10m it is not because they have so much faith in the company but simply because without working capital the company is insolvent - end of !

Know one would want to force a liquidation and it is idiotic to suggest that as a strategy - in a liquidation the licence falls and we have no asset. The only point to voting no is to force the hand of the BH to make a better offer on dilution Basically an idiotic comment and strategy

You can easily recognise Upanchors in the flesh, he's the one with the big red nose and size 16 yellow shoes. When he gets in his car the doors pop off.

CC who could you be referring too? - could you mean the big city cheese, well respected chief trader, self promoted expert on buying and selling shares and all round share sage??

Xel123 I would comment that if you are a long term investor that Cyan appears to know a lot more about this share than you do

how much Tw1t Oil got back need a good laugh !!

So Ben is calling an EGM to out the BOD - which should prove to be entertaining to say the least - first job when he is in will be to have a look at the so called independent audit that the BOD carried out (ha Ha Ha)and also see the figures and where the money has truly been spent.

Thanks matey !!

Hi Rightback - do you know what happened to the Filipino investment which they bought off of Trafigura - are they still invested or have they moved this off to this new high risk company?? Thanks Jonjo

as the auto spell does not like to post internet blog names on this site - suggest you all have a look at this broker note by TW as is indicates to its clients a 98% uplift in valuation at 178p with a very detailed broker note Looks very good news indeed !!

Another detailed broker note intended for sophisticated institutional investors not the great unwashed of the private investor community falls into my lap. A ****tard compliance officer earnings as much as five NHS nurses, may soon force us to remove it but ahead of then, Mirabaud has cut its target price fot Atalaya Mining (ATYM), formerly EMED, from 192p to 175p but with the shares at 88p that still offers 98% upside. - See more at: http://www.*************.com/views/23752/atalaya-another-detailed-broker-note-you-peasants-are-not-meant-to-see-mirabaud-sees-98-upside#sthash.8TRVE5Tf.dpuf

I have to admire you two for hanging in here, i had a serious issue with the previous BOD which I cannot and will not air on this BB and as a result stated some pretty damning comments as to certain posters, however your two seriously deserve a great result and I wish you well for a stonking upside Regards Jonjo

Is the AGM ?

LOL !!!