The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
However, I will not contribute further to this debate, but happy to be challenged if I am wrong, as it has been a good day for lths.
But that's dated 23 December which was, I think, before the meeting between the old Bod and Dr Cave. The only communication since is that he is entitled (or intends) to vote.
He'll probably still vote the same way, but I'm surprised that the simple 'intends to vote' only statement hasn't been discussed more. When it does get raised, it gets shouted down, which comes back to my concern about the long term SP.
I don't want to beat this drum too much, but Novice is suggesting that we haven't actually heard Dr Cave's intentions recently. Hopefully there is good reason (eg he's previously made his point, doesn't want to sway others as he is an employee etc). But, if this is correct - again, happy to stand corrected - then we should be able to acknowledge and discuss it reasonably.
Richmond, happy to stand corrected, but my understanding is that the recent email (and maybe more than one) just confirm his right (or maybe intention) to vote, but not how he will vote.
I hope he votes against, as have I, but the last update on this was pre-Christmas and since then there was the meeting between the old board and Dr Cave and the subsequent restructure. The radio silence on the topic is noticeable, but maybe simply due to being reprimanded previously for the bigger boat tweet, but Egremont has only said he was entitled to vote.
However, my main point was that a poster raised the concern and, rather than reasoned debate, others either flung insults or just tried to ignore the point.
Happy to stand corrected if anything here is incorrect.
Pumpky is correct. There has been no update from Dr Cave since before Christmas. We do not know for sure how he will vote. Egremont have repeatedly said that Dr Cave is entitled to vote, but not how he will vote.
I have said time and time again that the biggest threat to the SP is desperate holders deep underwater. When I see people respond to Pumpky with snide comments, glossi g over his points rather than discuss them, then we know people are still nervous and desperate. No doubt my post will get the same response, but as you will see from my past comments I have been here from Stratford Aero days and just want realistic debate to support long term SP.
Has Wednesday completion been confirmed or is this mspeculation?
So, an anonymous poster, with an anonymous email address, is asking people to share their photographic ID and details of their shareholding? And people are willing to do this?
How on earth can you tell by just looking at the volume whether they will vote for or against the warrants. Total nonsense.
I'm not aware that we have heard anything from Dr Cave recently, other than Egremont stating that he will vote. While pre-Christmas he was against the warrants, this could have been a tactical ploy. There have been many changes since then and his position could have changed. Happy to stand corrected if his position has been confirmed recently.
Thousands of posts in the last few weeks, all speculating about what might be happening. You pick up the phone three times and speak to someone who "doesn't want to say too much" but each time gives you the full story. Brilliant.
Didn't you also speak to them last week when they said they were already producing?
Except it's another ten days on top of another week and another week there and a further delay. It all adds up. Masks were meant to be in production in November.
The UK media did report these five layer masks before Christmas, but they didn't pass certification. This is just old news picked up by the Italian media.
Thank you. It's now appearing.
Anyone know how we vote on the warrants through AJ Bell? Usually they send an email with a link to an online voting tool, but I haven't received anything yet.
These articles continually mention five layer masks, but our focus is now on four layer. We know the five layer failed initial certification, with certification now not expected to mid February at the earliest. Are these articles just recycling old news from October and November?
Wouldn't want to be out of this over the weekend...wait until the US wakes up...guaranteed RNS Monday morning...some vague conspiracy theory about MMs wanting to keep the SP down.......
Hands up who had heard of this news outlet before today? Or where it's based? Yet apparently it's booooooommmmmm time. This is getting desperate.
MJ, my posts have always emphasised realistic expectations - not Boooooommmm or any of that nonsense. The GM announcement is a positive step. The warrants are hanging over the SP and holding it back. With these (hopefully) cancelled, the RMS board can move on and investors (current and potential) will have clarity.