Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
'I saw the machine.' Comedy gold!
Castlepaul, your posts always make me.giggle. iImagine saying that second quarter is "a toss up between hepa filters first customers volz and fertilizers". Do.you really think that newbies fall for this ramping? Thanks for the giggles!
Sorry Sharkie, the bigger boat has been totally missed. While it is admirable of you to try and drum up interest (will we get a RNS before Christmas? Who will we acquire?), it is clear that there will not be a RNS. You got your RNS last week. If there was any hope of a positive RNS anytime soon they would not have released the dreadful RNS last week.
As for acquisitions, is there really enough in the bank to fund an acquisition of anything significant, plus pay for staff, marketing campaigns etc etc? So, my question to you - how would an acquisition be funded?
IMHO DYOR
Poorinvestor starts and ends the week with his view that it will take just one more RNS and this will go to 7p, hoping that we ignore the last RNS (or indeed any of the recent RNSs).
Poor old Sharkie, trying to ramp this all by himself. As if the NHS buy masks off this site at £1 a pop. Thanks for making me giggle.
From yesterday: "rns due any day, this is going to explode". You got the first half right, but then spelled implode incorrectly!
Oh dear, clutching at straws. Yesterday you were saying that there was a blockbuster RNS coming and that this was going to 7p. Today you're telling us to talk about the jam tomorrow 'plans' and that a 20% drop to 0.6p isn't so bad.
Poorinvestor, what utter nonsense! You are plucking figures out of the air. You have absolutely no idea what the costs for the new site, new tech, and new employees will cost. As for the previous success in setting up a production line, are seriously referring to the Spanish machine shambles?
Agree this feels like another jam tomorrow RNS. Anyone who lived through the machine debacle last year will not like the move to in-house production, which is surprising given that the last (recent) strategic review moved to outsource production.
Sharkie, please learn the difference between your and you're.
Uddin posted this in October, but also included a point about the potential of Cloudveil. The next day NNN released a RNS to say they were disposing of Cloudveil!
Sharpie, please please learn the difference between your and you're if you want people to take you seriously.
"DR" M, you have been challenged by UG to come up with facts to substantiate your positivity. Why are you unable to meet the challenge?
Hospitals can't use our masks either. My concern is that Joe public will not pay £1+ for a one time use mask when they can get a nano mask which costs pennies per use.
EXAMS makes a really strong point. Google 'nano face masks' and NNN/pro-larva/p2f doesn't appear anywhere near the top of the list. In fact it didn't appear for me at all, but I clicked Search More only a few times. There are lots of other masks coming up, many reusable (one produced by the MOD seems particularly effective). While the reusable ones are more expensive than an individual disposable mask, the cost per wear must be a fraction of the cost of a disposable mask, plus you don't have to buy a box of them.
Just one teeny problem. These are the wrong type of mask for the NHS.
Wow! Reusable masks with nanotechnology. 3.5 pence per wear. This is the price point we should be targeting. What is the cost per wear for NNN masks?
Sharpie, please learn the difference between your and you're. Once or twice you could blame on your phone, but it's getting embarrassing for you now.
These Lancaster masks look seriously impressive.
Poorinvestor, you told me recently how concerned you are about covid, wanting to avoid lockdown etc. Surely therefore you must welcome these Lancaster masks, especially if they can get price these at an affordable level.