RE: So what has changed?24 Mar 2025 13:33
@evans "I think Sharebel is right to point out the exact wording of the RNS"
We are all very aware of the exact wording of the RNS, it is there for all to see, and we certainly don't need sharebel to point it out.
The objection is not that, it's the interpretation of the words in the RNS that sharebel is using to sow doubt which is the point of the matter!
We are all of us open to doubt, some more than others, absolutely entitled to voice those doubts, BUT
sharebel simply cannot make those doubts into a statement of fact!
It is, to repeat myself here, factually incorrect.
The only FACT is that no FIRM offer has yet been tabled but that is not the same thing as Sharebel is attempting to peddle, so don't be misled.