...annus horibilis....3 Sep 2017 08:20
.....Entirely my point! Morning Del & anyone left on the ss Sphere. Semantics really which pis have cottoned on to. At the risk of being tedious would you as an investor, (private or fund manager) not want to invest in an device that is a paradigm shift in bga technology and possible 'game changer' for the business? The words of an eminent Professor and CEO Rencken.
As far as I know the device works, is liked by those who have used it and hospitals cont to evaluate Proxima etc....and clearly has a future even if sales are slow to date. Well if we are to believe the bod apparantly not.......yet they seek funds to progress P4-5 and seek entry into the $ BN US Healthcare system. If W&E & small pis can see the advantages of that strategy (last ditch attempt?) how come nobody else has? The private Co argument does not wash with me for we know many funds invest in private start-ups, they did with Sphere. Edwards Life Sciences in 2010 (£2m) Sagentia & Siemens TA GmbH for instance were early stake holders and fund raisers. So why have most of our iis fled the Co given that their stakes in Sphere would be a tiny % of their overall portfolios and might well have stakes in other small private companies? I'll draw my own conclusion on that one!....Perhaps that's it they could afford to take losses against tax or (other dodges) and had no interest in seeing Sphere fulfill it's potential. That might prove a very very expensive mistake and cutting losses now and foregoing any compounding in years to come, have cut and run. So be it. Whatever we may think of WxE they have stood by us (so far) unlike the other rats, frantically swimming ashore. I hope the tides turn and they are washed out to sea.