RE: NIRP14 Oct 2020 13:16
"Priapic graphs exaggerate the true scale of infections. Deliberately vague language is used to pretend the pandemic is spiralling out of control.
A couple of weeks ago, the Two Ronnies of Doom were brandishing projections that by today there would be 50,000 new cases a day. In reality, there's been only around a third of that wild guess. And, anyway, what do they mean by 'cases'? We're not talking hospitalisations, or even deaths here. Just 'cases' — in other words, those who have tested positive for Covid.
But given that the number of tests is now running at 250,000 a day, it was inevitable the numbers of people testing positive would rise. The fact is, though, that up to 90 per cent are asymptomatic.
As for the deaths put down to Covid, take that with a shovel of salt, too. The authorities are still counting those who tested positive in the past 28 days, even if they died of something else.
They are reluctant, too, to tell us whether these unfortunate patients had other underlying conditions which would have killed them anyway. The Mail revealed last week that the average age of those who have died with Covid is 82 — a full year older than the average life expectancy in Britain.
How old are those admitted to hospital in Liverpool lately, and used to justify another draconian lockdown? Do they suffer from another potentially fatal condition, such as kidney failure or obesity? No one's saying."
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8832693/RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-Driven-fear-dodgy-science-bound-end-tiers.html
It does look as though our leaders are only looking at one side of the equation . The Stats we are being given aren't detailed enough , IMO. Such policies might hasten the implementation of NIRP.
Well worth a read of the full article .