RE: Pr26 Sep 2023 12:05
G_G_G, re your fri 11:00 post (and yesterday & today), it is a sad indictment of the company.
But one earned.
If the company is serious about increasing their Canadian ownership, then they will need to give them that which they are used to getting from other Canadian peers: quarterly updates in a timely fashion. That would immediately cancel all the accusations of lateness and missed self-imposed timelines from the UK holders. Currently, imo, they sit on the data until they have achieved a prior period-beating production output, instead of keeping the market updated.
BUT they cannot repeat their previous campaign using the Market Herald interview.
This was only TWENTY days before the Loan Notes expired and Majid was still waxing lyrical about the 2023 drilling programme and 26,000boepd peak and 22,250 to 23,000 boepd for the year, and continuing the dividend at the higher rate.
We now know that the expectations of that drilling programme had already run aground, as evidenced by the 29 June RNS and the 5 July presentation, with most production increases moved to H2, and guidance reduced to 20,000-21,000boepd.
So this interview was just bravado when he also knew that the [new] loan repayment was going to take precedence over future monthly dividends. The justification of the loan arrangement used in the Company Meet seems somewhat specious.
With the Clear the Decks & System Reset RNS, came a new table of Commodity Assumptions and NTM Income sensitivities.
Only to be followed by another new set with the H1 results, dated for August, but the period ended only one day after the RNS which cannot create confidence in their expectations.
Moreover, why have they set the production guidance so low. They have presented images of the revised production growth for Q3&4, have bagged 20,640boepd for H1, July was 22,065 so for the low of 20,000 the rest of the year would be just over 19,000. What are they not telling us if that is their realistic view? If 22,065 was maintained the yearly boepd would be 21,350+.
Production would also increase if another asset was acquired, but that would most probably involve some dilution which is not much of an incentive for PIs who have just had their monthly income withdrawn whilst watching their capital severely diminish.
But is an acquisition any more likely than real progress at Serenity?