Member Info for Jimzi

Oh dear deep.
There was a 13m overhang.
The 25m was an ordinary trade at 12.2p. T2 settlement so they could pay Link
No mm involvement at all.

V simple for all to understand save your good self.

Yep; too busy “learning” from bitter posters whilst not looking into the adaptability of Flu-v for C19
It covers pandemic flu- I’m no expert but I’m surprised how little chat there is here regarding this- oh fook it - let’s talk about ????????????

For the weekend

1) deep misery to provide a evidence link
2) Rudy to tell us who his best Aim mate is
3) John Henry still counting but clueless

For those not up to speed , we have posters who claiming that an “O” -ordinary trade - read normal and no delayed settlement or equal counterparty obligation etc can be priced to the market ( a trade on the London Stock Exchange LSE) that actually is not at the right price - an ordinary trade with a moveable price - an interesting but frankly ridiculous proposition.
Any regular investor knows how an ii dumps their shares-they lodge with one mm who just turns the tap on and off until sold ; they don’t ever transact 4% of the company on a whim esp at over 8% above a recent placing price -

As ever. DYOR

Or just watch a Lady in the Van
Intrigue and love. Lacking so much in this undercurrent of bitterness. Steam ears .

O trades are ordinary deals executed. Ordinary, no terms attached- price and volume as stated/ reported.

You may be right that there’s a massive conspiracy against the OO market ( and reporting rules) for the sake of part of a spivy conformer deal for only part of their holding but frankly it’s a sheet conspiracy- cause the” weekend” facts aren’t facts are they?
Why on earth would an mm take a large chunk at an 8% plus premium to the last placing? And on an ordinary trade. Very simple, they wouldn’t.

And any dodgy agreement would not be an ordinary trade. Full stop ,

Waiting to learn from your best mate though- seriously, name the company.

I don’t listen to hearsay and innuendo- dooper stated facts for the weekend- waiting- not with baited breath

Feel free to support facts . Did I recall a little Hitler comments before?? Pea**** time over matey

What exactly have you learned?

Peeps who focus on uncertainty about Acacia stock Left To deter and not on the investment case here are the ones to watch.
There is a very compelling investment case here; why the negativity? There’s your answer.

So what have you learned?

It’s worth a lot if you name him and the company and the circumstances as to how he knows - otherwise it’s the usual bs
Ordinary trades are a correct reflection of the quantity and price.

Just prove that statement is ( and what’s the point of categorising trades otherwise) wrong with evidence - not my mate stuff .
My mate owns a chippy - nice chips btw, a dash of chicken fat in the oil and put some béarnaise sauce on the fish before battering and you have .....
But he ain’t an expert in this murky nonsense.

Cant figure why some are so desperate ( wink)

Right, in the world we live in , we accept trades and prices as reported and with the type so unless there is evidence to refute it......
O equals no smoke. BC, non protected, cross at price, etc do try and massage the picture. As do delays. Non pertinent.

Please Provide evidence , not just your whimsical ideas too suit your brilliant mind . ( and of course your position)

Watching Gardner’s World- excellent bit about natural manure and Camphors.

Recommended viewing for relaxation

Very good albeit school boy adulation agitated, what was the trade type? Non protected asset? Crossed at same price ? BC? O etc etc? Don’t state it’s a fact without solid evidence- not what you think.

I know , that’s why I posted earlier today.

Look , if you want your beliefs to be true, great. I’m more interested in this excellent prospect share.
Anyway, ask John Henry what’s going on ; he’s no doubt recommended you .
Nice w/e

Funny that ?? The trade type ?
Utter nonsense- there is no need for a priced trade- a single one so not multiple mm- they just plonk the lot with a mm and tell him to do his usual thing of up and down etc.
It happens all the time with forward selling and ii sells. Again, why would a or some mms get involved with a massive trade print that’s priced and go against their normal modus operandi.
You state facts but still no evidence whatsoever. If you post some, fair dos

A published price isn't a real price - do provide links for this to back up your
" facts" that the price reported can be meaningless cause if your premise is right, it sort of drives a horse and cart through trade reporting since the inception of stock market reporting.[and I might get onto my broker and tell him to adjust some of my prices]

Fell into the grammar joke trap - or is it spelling.!
Nice to see a poster with education.
Yep, the old DMA's are reading the bb- Hi..yes we know the book for volume is a farce and A trades trying to winkle - v easy to read this one
Have a good w/e all

I think digging him up is no problem, its holding all the constituent parts together may be the problem - spot the pun!
Jolly still waiting for Godo

replace being with becoming - gotta get your gramma write!

You have to learn how the book works here - unique.
Those who have know 10-12p is as likely as a Jeremy Thorpe being PM

The seller is out and has been for ages. Just bored trading pot peeps. - lockdown has made many very impatient and they have to do something to pass the time.

As for the 25m being taken by an MM at 12.25p! Yea, sure he's going to sell them for less.
Acacia are Amercan? See Markshares post.

Yes; almost purposeful underselling- doesn’t enamour trust but given all the green lights. It makes you wonder.
Benevolent view; there is clearly a seller, what for total exit. Fook knows. I know this is a 5% hedge against a very possible fiat crisis. GL

Absolutely- the machines on auto pilot do the work - 2 peeps to make sure no fire etc. It’s brilliant.
Meeting once a month to check and tweek.
Love the concept, management need to show why half plus are needed.

Nothing new really - the problem atm is we only have an idea of profitability on the SL contract - the rest you can’t evaluate

Vol was 84k then