Member Info for Jimmy_Stocks

Don’t think Oppenheimer do 3 month investments. Try 5 years

Or they are just quoting these names to jazz up the RNS and emphasis Sony's history in the industry?

Good question Themis. Does anybody know the answer to this?

Are they saying they will be recreating gigs that have gone before?

Have any shareholders had any updates recently? The latest newsletter said talks would conclude before the end of August. I wonder what the next update is going to be? Surely a concrete IPO date?

These Titanic and Apollo 11 have great reviews and will help to drive people to VR, which is good for EVRH. They have the Blizt bombings in collaboration with the BBC coming next quarter.

Education is a much bigger umbrella than just schools. Corporate training for one. That said I have around double the amount invested in EVRH compared to my VRE stake.

I think the article is saying indirect link is because if an investor is looking for VR exposure, then VRE now offers this. Of course there is now also IMMO, and I'm sure other IPOs in the pipeline considering over $4b was invested by VC's last year in VR/AR. That's the way I read it anyway.

Fwiw I'm invested in VRE, think it's a great company. I am bullish on VR though and believe these companies will increase in value as the whole market increases. A simple view some would say but I am abit of a simpleton in many ways. VRE release their results week commencing 17th Sept and I have a feeling the mcap won't be £30m for long.

Nice article. Nice to have your own views backed up.

Anybody who is not deliberately trying to deramp to get a position knows those revenue figures mean zero at this stage. The 72% is also meaningless though in my opinion, due to investors being a large part of the very small sample.

I am looking forward to China launch - http://www.china.org.cn/business/2018-08/25/content_60208994.htm

Sony have been betting on VR arguably more anybody else over the past few years.

I hope the bod keep hold of this golden ticket for as long as they can. A good number of big players have a slice of the pie here, and this seems fairly evenly distributed between them. This should hopefully guard against any cheap buyout.

Broadcast.com sold to Yahoo for $6b in 1999 - their service was to audio stream live events across the interview, when the internet was still in it's infancy. If we start streaming live events in VR across all these venues we're signing up (theatre, comedy, live sports further down the line), I think £1 per share will look very cheap, so I hope we can resist any early buy out, and keep building and signing deals for at least the next 3 years.

If we are looking at likely buyers though, NextVR are backed by some massive money. I have said before on here that they would be near the top of the list of likely buyers. Together with NextVR, it would create a VR streaming service that would join the list of recent established monsters, YouTube, Netflix and Spotify.

Hopefully they hold out though and keep building. Be there to ride the wave of incoming exponential growth that is speeding towards us.

https://www.theverge.com/2018/8/23/17769166/imogen-heap-concert-oculus-vr-headset-thewavevr

I don't think it is out of the Oculus Go. I hope there are plans to release soon. It would be good to have release dates on different formats but maybe that is difficult to pin down with the development team, I don't know.

Reading some of the comments on Youtube of this Titanic experience, words such as 'visceral' stick out to me. Imo this will be more popular and generate more revenue than the Apollo 11 feature.

I have very much found this to be the case in my short time researching / investing Besty. Seems the old boys club get their fill early on, long before joe public gets a look in. NextVR a good example of that imo. Spotify IPO'd at mega money but there must have been several years of investing opportunities for a fraction of that IPO price if you mixed in the right circles.

It is great to be in this share early, although it still looks like 'the man' is having their fun, rocking the sp up and down, knowing there will likely be a large number of inexperienced investors in this who might sell on the turbulence.

Is buying and holding/ adding not a good tactic then? When exactly do you slice? Do you have any crystal balls I can purchase?

Right on Besty. Just watched it, he is 1 smooth bastard :D said exactly the same, you can see why he has signed these deals. I was watching a documentary last night on Mark Cuban and Broadcom. Melody reminds me of this company, just replace the dawn of the internet with the dawn of Virtual Reality.

I keep seeing this suggestion for Directors to buy. Do they not have warrants they can exercise and have the shares for 1.1p or whatever it is? Why on earth would they buy at the market rate? Unless I've misunderstood something

When seagulls follow the trawler, it is because they think sardines will be thrown into the sea.

Sqwarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrk!

It is obvious now BA but the world is full of people calling things after the event has happened. There were 1 or 2 calling it but suddenly everybody knew and it was obvious.

I see you one of the people slating AM. Like others have said and I share the same view, him saying I'm not concerned with the share price was him saying I'm not bothered by it because there is nothing to worry about or no concern.

I am a novice investor so I'm not going to pretend I would know when to buy and sell. I do my research on a company and then follow it up with an investment. All this getting in and out is not for me. Chasing £50 profit here n there, no thanks I'd rather sit in the garden.

People saying why didn't you sell weeks ago etc what a load of hogwash. It's akin to saying why didn't you bet on x after the game has finished.

If anybody is skilled enough to time trades perfectly then fair enough. I would guess these folk are in the very small minority however and have forward information before joe public. I invested in this company because I invested in the future. I haven't made any losses because I still hold the shares. All this noise around forces pi's to sell, does Warren Buffet buy and sell and wet his nappy at short term fluctuations? Or does he invest in companies he believes in and wants to own long term?

There is enough BS on this board to overflow a landfill.

They haven’t marketed the product yet though from what I can see. I don’t use Facebook though to see the pop up ads via there. Facebook would incur an opportunity cost if they were plastering Oculus Go adverts across their Facebook app. Cunir the first figures released is very early days to be making a definitive judgement and decision on the investment imo. This is a 3-5 year thing for me.

AM doing a pretty good job for me. Signing deals left right and centre. I am heavily invested here at an average of around 12 and I’m not concerned at all. Nothing has changed to the reasons why I invested and invested for the long term. In fact no, things have changed but for the better because we can signing new agreements. The process of headset release and uptake is in the very early stages. Oculus have not spent anything on marketing the Go. I read Nvidia copyrighting various VR trademarks, plenty of senior folk within business excited by VR. I am very relaxed about this business. All the actions by the board are with a long term perspective. AM not concerned with the sp because we are tied 100% to headset sales and that party hasn’t even started yet. I only wish I had spare funds to add more.

Yes bonkers, this is good news for EVRH imo - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-45133094