RE: Drummond21 Jun 2016 22:56
Beer: cash and near cash is not illuquid Izal in a private subsidiary whose value is chosen purely by the quirk of how much the last entrant paid for their Izal.
The statement before suspension IMO was unambiguous and didn't (shouldn't?) include the value of the unlisted subsidiary. Cash and near cash or whatever he said. C&CE is the accountancy term for liquid assets.
The trap here, possibly (because I don't want to have to go back to the High Court to defend a post !!!) might be that the new BoD turn Drummond down, fail to realise any cash for shareholders, and then Drummond says "Hey if you'd have taken me up on my offer then we would have a million from the sale of the App".
Problem is the App has lost momentum, the market has moved on so we have lost our advantage somewhat, and who knows what the original developers are doing now and whether we can rope them back and tie them down with service contracts to rebuild business around the app to sell on.
This is a huge fecking bear trap - the question really must remain how much will investors get back (assuming Teathers App can't be flogged) and if that is not the equivalent of around a million divided between shareholders then why were being lead to believe there was cash (not balance sheet bs) coming into suspension?
Another question might be the pitiful performance of Lenifart and the ilk