RE: Related Party Transaction29 Jun 2016 13:29
But what's the penalty for breaking AIM rules... when you're no-longer listed on the exchange???!!
So back-date all the ills to make them look a bit more legit, but don't worry about rules being broken because they're not even listed.
I know Ben and co are taking legal advice, but I wonder whether AIM rules could be seen as forming a contract between the company and the shareholder, and failing to follow the rules, if proven, would be a breach of contract potentially making the directors liable for all losses suffered as a result? And we all know the loss from failure to maintain a listing. I'm just thinking off the top of my head here, really, but civil contract law might be an alternative to pursuing other complaints as it gives those who have lost out a claim.