Member Info for JiffyBag

Jack Bai, who owns 124.20m shares in GST

Vimlogy China

https://vimlogydev.caliber.com.sg/

AHS,

Incorporated Aug 25, 2017

https://directory.singaporefintech.org/directory/listing/vimlogy-pte-ltd?sort=oldest

Question is when did their logo appear on the Angra Website?

https://www.angraglobal.com

Toffers,

I think that Newmont will want Havieron at the end of the day, and that ultimately means Telfer will be saved come what may.

Havieron will be the 'Golden Goose' that lays many valuable eggs for NEM.

Timelines? that's another question to be honest, all I can say at this juncture, is that SD IMHO will have already held discussions with NEM and hopefully have secured a deal.

2 Final advisories, disable Cortana and Siri on your phone.

My advice, place your phone under your farting dogs cushion, then you will only be be bombarded with,'How to stop your dog farting adverts' 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Or, just put your phone in a soundproof bag if that exists, when discussing anything.

Billy,

Your phone will be listening to your conversations, that is a 100% known issue. You need to turn off the microphone in your phone settings as and when required as there are AI tracking pieces of software that actively listen in to to your vocal inputs.

I have also experienced the same exact scenarios, eg you and friends discuss the merits of purchasing/owning a Ford model XYZ ..........and behold a day or 2 later, you find that you are being spammed with Ford adverts etc for the very same model.

Turn the microphone off in between when you want to make a call, and I bet the number of adverts will drop.

So in conclusion, this might well agree with Hydro's hypotheis?

https://www.ggpchat.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=780

Try the AI link for yourselves, ask your questions and see what comes up?

https://www.anthropic.com/

Post your questions and answer on here!

GLA!

How many of you out there have used AI websites?

Very good AI website_Claude : Courtesey of TrekMadone on DEC

https://www.anthropic.com/

Question:

'Greatland Gold are based in Western Australia and have a Joint Venture agreement with Newcrest mining whom in turn about to be merged with Newmont mining.

My question is, will Newmont continue with the Havieron gold project once they have bought out Newcrest or will Newmont put their 70% of Havieron up for sale?

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Claude's Answer:

Based on the information provided, a few key points regarding Greatland Gold's Havieron gold project and the potential impacts of the Newcrest-Newmont merger:

Newcrest currently owns 70% of the Havieron project as part of a joint venture agreement with Greatland Gold, who owns the remaining 30%.

Newcrest has been actively developing Havieron since 2019, investing significantly in exploration and drilling programs. This suggests they view it as a valuable growth asset.

Newmont is seeking to acquire Newcrest in a merger transaction expected to close in 2023.After acquiring Newcrest, Newmont will inherit their 70% stake and joint venture interest in Havieron.

Newmont has strategic focus on gold production and reserves. Havieron represents a large untapped gold resource that could bolster Newmont's future production pipeline.

Divesting a major gold deposit like Havieron soon after acquisition seems unlikely given its potential value and Newcrest’s prior investment.More likely Newmont continues advancing Havieron as planned to realize its resource potential, while benefiting from Greatland’s local expertise.

In summary, Newmont has incentives to retain and develop the Havieron project to capitalize on its gold resources. Unless unexpected issues arise, they will likely continue the existing JV with Greatland rather than selling their acquired stake post-merger. But continued monitoring of Newmont’s strategic priorities is advised.

LOL Billy. , Don't ask Claude anything personal Eh?

Going to ask who is Katstrangler and L88? 🤣

Despite my e-mails to IR's, kind of Ironic.

Overall, I agree with the answer.

Here's another question:

'Why are Public Relations very poor at GST?'

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Answer by Claude:

There are a few potential reasons why GSTechnologies may have had limited public relations and interviews so far:

As a startup still in development stages, they may be focused on building out their technology and securing regulatory approvals before actively promoting the brand. They may be limiting PR to avoid overpromising before their product is ready for market. Going quiet now sets expectations accordingly.

GST may not want to attract too much attention from potential competitors who could copy/undermine aspects of their model if disclosed prematurely. Stealth mode is common for fintechs.As a B2B neobank, their target customers are businesses not consumers. Less need for mass-market PR now versus launch.

Limited resources/experience with PR and marketing as a young company focused on tech. May need to hire a dedicated PR lead.Leadership team may not be media-friendly or shy away from interviews. A strong PR team could help manage this.Simply focusing PR efforts on earning government/regulatory support first before consumer outreach.

Overall, the lack of PR may be deliberate at this stage or reflect GST's startup constraints. But as launch nears they would benefit from increased PR to establish their brand, highlight unique features, get visibility, and attract customers. A strategic PR plan can help build traction ahead of market entry.

Billy,

Try it yourself, pose your question print it on here, together with Claudes answer.

https://www.anthropic.com/

AHS, in part yes but I also asked some pre questions, eg.

Question:

'GST have been accepted onto the Innovations Pathway programme managed by the FCA, will such acceptance increase the chance of gaining a licence to use a stablecoin based currency that is backed up by hard Fiat currency?'

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Answer by Claude:

The FCA's Innovation Pathway program provides regulatory support and assistance for innovative fintech companies like GSTechnologies to test and deploy their solutions in the UK market. Getting accepted into this program is a positive step, but does not guarantee they will ultimately gain approval for a stablecoin issuance or e-money license. Here are a few key points:

The Innovation Pathway provides a dedicated contact for regulatory guidance, direct access to support teams, and other resources to help companies meet compliance standards. This can certainly help streamline the process.

However, the FCA will still undertake in-depth assessments of companies' business models, technology, safeguards, etc. before granting licenses. Meeting all regulatory requirements is necessary.

Issuing stablecoins for use as a currency involves significant regulatory considerations around prudential standards, stabilization mechanisms, redemption rights, clearing and settlement protocols, and more.

Backing the stablecoins 1:1 with fiat currency reserves addresses some concerns but does not fully guarantee approval. Ongoing reporting and auditing of reserves would be required.

Ultimately, the FCA will decide if GSTechnologies' proposals around blockchain-based stablecoins for B2B payments meet all standards around risk management, consumer protection, safeguarding funds, AML/KYC, and operating a responsible e-money business.

In summary, the Innovation Pathway provides helpful support but GSTechnologies must still convincingly demonstrate their stablecoin model is compliant, sustainable, and merits approval. The process may take significant time and effort despite the FCA assistance.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Try it for yourself AHS, I think Claude works by scanning the whole internet and will come up with with the pro's and conn's etc of your question, some will be factually correct other results will be based on opinion etc.

Here's a thing ever heard of Claude? no he's not a Trainer Designer but a avery good AI website.

Here's my question to Claude.

So far the UK has passed a bill called the 'Financial Services & Markets Bill' that will embrace the use of Stablecoins etc.

However, what do you really think of the chance of existing financial institutions/banks lobbying the British government against any new NEO banks becoming realty in order to protect their own monopoly?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here's Claudes answer:

You raise a good point. There is a real possibility that existing financial institutions and banks may lobby against neobanks like GSTechnologies to protect their own interests and market share. Some factors to consider:

Traditional banks may see neobanks as disruptive competitors, especially if they leverage new technologies like blockchain and stablecoins to provide faster, cheaper services. They will want to resist this.

Major banks have significant resources and already have lobbying influence with government. So they can potentially sway policymakers against approving neobank licenses.That said, UK regulators like the FCA seem open to fostering competition and innovation in financial services, as seen by the new Financial Services and Markets Bill.

The FCA is also launching initiatives like the Innovation Pathway to support neobanks and fintechs, recognizing their potential consumer benefits.Government will have to balance allowing innovation versus maintaining banking system stability and protecting incumbents. But the overall policy direction seems focused on the former.

Neobanks may find allies in consumers, small businesses, and technologists who want more competition in banking. These groups can apply counter-lobbying pressure.

Overall, while the threat of bank lobbying cannot be discounted, the regulatory trend and public sentiment seem to favor allowing controlled innovation. GSTechnologies will need strong business plans and coalition building to override any lobbying efforts by major banks. But the policy climate seems largely supportive if neobanks can prove their models are sound.

So let's hope GST are up to speed, think they are except for the PR stuff, bloody good this AI stuff! 😀

Claude link: Courtesey of TrekMadone on DEC

https://www.anthropic.com/

'AHS patients is need(ed).

I think there are enough patients here Billy 😂, it's like an asylum ward at the moment on here, 'One flew over the Cuckoos Nest springs to mind'.

Anyway getting back to basics , how many of you out there actually e-mailed Investor Relations re the poor Public Relations from GST? Need to keep the pressure up IMHO!

'mcqueen trainers???? they look like orthopedic shoes as seen in dementia wards'

Mad me laugh 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Newuncle,

Had a look today on CSFS BB. Only issue I have is that you seem to be talking to yourself, most if not all the majority of posts are yours!.

Red Flag for me sorry,