Member Info for JiffyBag

1. That SB knew well in advance that a NEM bid for NCM was on the cards well before he was removed by NCM, and well before the 5% debacle, that in part is the reason why he/NCM refused the 5% offer by GGP for $85m?

2. Why was the $85m offer refused? IMO, it was refused because SB was banking on GGP not being able to raise further cash to survive over the long term and more importantly hang on over an extended duration to raise further cash until a NEM/NCM takeover deal had been successfully concluded, and that could well last into early 2024? Thankfully Wyloo our white Knight have now come to the rescue re the latest RNS.

3. If such thinking was actually correct (All Conjecture at this point of course) , what would SB have achieved? A nice cheap takeover of GGP’s 30%?

4. Moving onwards, that scenario did not play out well for SB, as SD outplayed him etc, SD is a seasoned chess player it would seem.

5. So what you may ask, am I getting at?

6. There seems to be a continuing discussion on here that NEM if successful in taking over NCM will divest Hav/Telfer?

7. I don’t believe that will transpire , I think NEM will actually want to keep Hav/Telfer for 3 reasons.

8. The first being NEM are looking to save/reduce costs over the next 2 years over their whole portfolio and will not be wanting to fund high decommissioning costs for Telfer when there is a very viable project sat on their own front door right next to Telfer. Secondly, Havieron is an asset with potential that cannot be simply ignored in terms of what revenues/profit it will generate over say at least 15-20 years. Thirdly, RIO are now knocking on the door, just on their periphery, can’ see NEM being ecstatic about that, can you?

9. So all in all, I actually think the NCM JV will continue as planned with NEM and for GGP we will start to earn some much needed cashflow and who knows in the not too distant future maybe a dividend or 2.

Strong Buy according to investing.com

https://www.investing.com/equities/greatland-gold-plc-technical

Well spotted Hopefully Gold, that's all we need right now even more Carp data.

Just wish those who put this type of stuff out, would do a sense check first to see if it is actually correct FFS!

Got it now , Juicy Fruit Cake 🤣🤣🤣

Toffers,

Who is 'JF' ?

Try again, Go to Equity Short Interest> View Data> Filter > Symbol>GRLGF

Https://www.finra.org/finra-data/browse-catalog/equity-short-interest/data

Toffers,

The majority of shorters are 'Stateside' IMHO as you put it, just my guess and it is a calculated guess.

Big question: Who would benefit from this and why? (Takeover / buyout of Hav scenario?)

NEM are USA based go figure .

FINRA =USA Market, this I believe is the main hub of shorts for GGP at the moment.

https://www.finra.org/finra-data

Go to Equity Short Interest> View Data> Filter > Search By Symbol> type in GRLGF (GGP USA Traded Epic Code)

4. Resulting, Data shown in table, as at the end of July only a mere 8,066,272 shares are shorted?

Ortex Short interest figures are questionable IMHO, as posted by 1 star reviews on Trustpilot.

https://www.trustpilot.com/review/ortex.com

So, Shares on Loan are they simply IMHO, just a figure of available shares to be loaned?? since if as Ortex would have you believe 60m are now out on loan and are all being shorted, or are they?

Doggy,

Re: 'You’ve shorted greatland gold haven’t you?'

Same thoughts crossed my mind along with the Carp 12 months out of date article from Simply, simply, wall street article plus a plethora of desperate posters trying to frighten off LTH investors. It ain't going to work as we now have a much clearer understanding of what news and in what order will be arriving over the next 6 months.

Just filter them or simply ignore them would be my advice.

Chatty,

Been watching Rc365 and Wandisco for some time now and most of all have watched the volatility of the Rc365 SP.

Many holders like yourself always blame the MM's, why is that?

Thing is, MM's are in theory at least only here to make a 'Market', they don't care a jot what the SP is as long as they can create volume and trade and just make a profit just like you?

At the end of the day it's all about investor sentiment, if there are enough people willing to buy and hold this share then then the SP will rise, it's as simple as that Yes??????

Mark et al,

The sooner we get ourselves off AIM the better for all shareholders I reckon.

One question for Shaun at the next TH?

Agree Mr Tosh, early days as yet, but more in the pipeline still to be announced so to speak.

Moving steadily ahead in a positive manner and so would reasonably expect a progressive update within the next month or so.

Just my opinion.

Saxondale, as requested and all who sail in the good ship GGP! 🤑.

........|

......./.\

..... /__\

.....|===|

.....|..G..|

.....|..G..|

.....|..P..|

.....|......|

.....|......|

.....|......|

.....|......|

.....|......|

.....|......|

..../|#||#|\

.../.|#||#|.\

../..|#||#|..\

..|../^||^\..|

..|./.^||^.\.|

..|/..^||^..\|

.....(VVV)

......(VV)

.......(V)

........*l*

.......( * )

...( % : % )

.( %%:%%)

( % % % % )

(%%%.%%)

%#%#%#%

Encephalopathy,

Re: 'Did GS technologies attract Jack and Shayne or was it the other way around. They sought GST for its UK listing. All falling into place. Any time your ready innovation pathway!'

For me Jack had already made an intrusion into the money payment business, well before GST decided to go down that path. Look at VImlogy etc and it's history, re 2017, and MWisePay etc.

What we have now is, GST are using Jack's knowedge and experience plus the benefit of all legal requirements/advice via the UK's Pinsent & Masons to build a viable business be it UK based or otherwise.

Hopefully we capitalise on making use of the FCA innovation pathway but it also looks like GST are well prepared to go it alone and will not have to wait upon formal UK regulatory permissions if so required.

Why do I say that?

Simply because GST have now purchased a Canadian registered MSB business,(Foreign exchange dealing

Money transferring,Dealing in virtual currencies) etc

https://www10.fintrac-canafe.gc.ca/msb-esm/public/detailed-information/msb-details/7b226d73624f72674e756d626572223a3137303832322c227072696d617279536561726368223a7b226f72674e616d65223a2250415950542046696e616e6365204c7464222c2273656172636854797065223a317d7d/

This alternative option in strategy IMHO will not hold GST back in moving forwards?

So in conclusion for now, my only concern is with points:

2,5,& 7

8. Legal, Regulatory Compliance and Contractual Issues. These questions simply review the legal and regulatory issues associated with the company. They are a measure of how “clean” the company is and whether they have had problems in the past.

9. Business Profitability. These are just a few simple questions on financial status, i.e. a basic sieve looking for obvious problems that might tend to rule them out as an investment proposition.

10. Marketing and PR Competence. All companies have to market their goods and services if they are to be successful and this is usually on public display so shareholders can easily review their operations in this area. Also if you cannot understand what a company does, can anyone else?

11. Share Liquidity. An illiquid market for a stock, which will also typically mean it has a high spread, will tend to make buying/selling shares both difficult and expensive. It will also put off other potential investors.

12. Trust and Track Record. With any listed company, but particularly so with small AIM companies, knowing that your directors have demonstrated past competence and that you can trust them to act in your interests are two very important requisites.

Some judgement on these matters might be required, but the answers to the questions above might give you some hints. Obviously researching the history of a company and of the directors can help, as can meeting the directors

Interesting Question Bamps:

Re: Why would you give AIM a wide berth?

This is from Sharesoc.

AIM company scorecard:

https://www.sharesoc.org/investor-academy/advanced-topics/aim-company-scorecard/

1. Shareholder Friendly. This section simply tries to identify whether companies, and their directors, adopt a positive attitude to individual shareholders, and give you the opportunity to learn more about their company and its management.

2. Shareholder Control. It is good to have directors interests aligned with other shareholders by them holding enough shares to have a significant financial interest in the success of the company. But having too many shares puts them in a dictatorial position.

3. Corporate Governance. These questions confirm whether the company adheres to normal public company corporate governance standards and in particular have truly independent non-executive directors dominating the board rather than executives.(???) AIM listed companies should not be run as if they are private businesses by founders, major shareholders or a clique of executives because they are likely to act in their interests rather than your own. Independent non-executives, including a Chairman, are the only people who can protect the interests of minority shareholders.

4. Remuneration of directors should be reasonable for the size and profitability of the company and be subject to shareholder approval. Excessive remuneration, particularly very aggressive bonus schemes, encourages risky behaviour and in small companies can divert profits away from investors to directors. The performance of companies is inversely correlated with the pay of directors so base pay should be only a fair market wage for the job being done. Out-performance that generates good profits should be reflected in the increased value of their own shareholdings or dividends paid so that Directors interests are aligned with shareholders.

5. Company Registration. Companies whose legal base is overseas may not be subject to the Takeover Panel Code (an important protection for minority shareholders), and can often create legal difficulties when wrong-doing needs to be pursued.

6. AGM Procedures. How the company treats shareholders at General Meetings is an important sign as to their general attitude to investors (and particularly individual shareholders who are the main people who attend AGMs at present). The details of the resolutions on the agendas for such meetings are also important to understand the directors’ attitudes to corporate governance and other matters. Not all investors have the time to attend AGMs but ShareSoc publishes a number of reports on them and if you can get someone to attend and write a report so much the better (ShareSoc offers a prize for good reports).

7. Share Dilution. Share dilution is of major concern to private investors in AIM companies now that rights issues are rare, and placings all too common.

Don't forget he had lots of fingers in lots of pies before he joined up with GST.

https://www.marketscreener.com/business-leaders/GuoJin-Bai-0M3SYK-E/biography/

100% it's him

Bai Guo jin

124,200,000

6.98%

Bai Guojin

https://www.gstechnologies.co.uk/investor-relations