Member Info for JiffyBag

Wizard,

It is on the DOD site.

https://drillordrop.com/2019/03/06/judgement-reserved-in-challenge-to-ineos-fracking-protest-injunction/

'Yesterday the court heard arguments for Mr Corre and Mr Boyd. DrillOrDrop report

They claimed the injunction was unprecedented, wide-ranging, vague in its definitions and based on exaggerated and untested evidence. It breached the human rights of opponents of fracking and was having a chilling effect on protest, the court heard.

Today, Alan Maclean QC, for Ineos, continued his defence of the injunction, which has since been used as template by four other shale gas companies.

On “persons unknown”, Mr Maclean said'

Cannot see INEOS a multi Billion company taking this lying down, can you?

Just need the right legal team to knock this on the head.

plus a successful Lancaster EPS,

The question in my mind is when will a SP of £1.02 be attained based on their analysis?

For me it's when the GWA has been drilled and analysed, plus a successful EPS, so at best will not be for at least 12 months?

Ignore , question, just noted the word 'Extra', sorry.

Having said that, where will the extra FPSO come from?

Must be short in supply?

Adouk,

Re; Extra FPSO on GWA.

Excuse my ignorance, but this is something that has been in my mind.

Are HUR planning to connect the GWA to the AM?

WNNY,

Fair enough, This is what I have just found,

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=Water+in+Saudi+Oilfields+

'Simmons also argued that the Saudis may have irretrievably damaged their large oil fields by over-pumping salt water into the fields in an effort to maintain the fields' pressure and boost short-term oil extraction.'

Have to say am somewhat surprised, but it is not from natural occurrences, ie is man made , via pumping water in which is not the same, which was my original point.

Highlander,

re: Some of their biggest fields are producing 80% water.

That is a very interesting point that you make, I personally have not seen anything on the internet about that, really. Given a lot of the oil lies beneath a desert etc.

Not saying that what you are saying is incorrect, just interested.

Where have you read that?

Lets get real,

The MF has zero credibility, always has , always will., just pure Sales driven Clickbait.

I do have some faith in Trustpilot as use them a lot.

See their opinion.

https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/fool.com

Public Relations??




Brian Alexander / David Bick


Tel: 01483 243450

Subito,

Not sure which telephone number you may have used, but there are some numbers on the AGM RNS, first page.

http://irpages2.equitystory.com/websites/rns_news/English/1100/news-tool---rns---eqs-group.html?article=28780890&company=ukog

fg5,

Getting off AIM whilst maybe desirable, is not a panacea for stability , eg look at Sirius Minerals.

The other advantage of AIM shares of course is if the share qualifies can be exempt from inheritance tax.

https://www.investec.com/en_gb/investment/investment-management/aim-portfolio-inheritance-tax-plan.html

asp2014

I am of course somewhat naive on such matters, I imagine the FPSO is in fact becoming a Buoy in itself?

It is just the thought of the vessel rockin and roolling in a heavy storm with all the connections to the well that made me think about it.

Hello Adouk, :0)

Now then, the AM is 'Hooked Up', but one question in my mind is this.

I have read about Weather Vaning etc, but in reality how does a vessel like AM cope with a bad storm? Does the ship drop the buoy and head for port if required to do so?

https://www.oilandgaspeople.com/news/18103/breaking-new-licensing-round-west-of-scotland-to-open-up-supermassive-oil-fields-where-100-years-of-oil-predicted/?fbclid=IwAR0gwm7D_Igu7DOdu0RlWvUBgfqBSNj44283x6e1pEzQBf_O0v0HWy2D3E0

Personally, I want us to develop incrementally, one well finances the next well, and so on.

I will always remember Lord Weinstock whom was the chairman of GEC, and his philosophy was always 'Cash is King'

Let the real cash earned be the determinant of moving forward, rather than raising cash via 'Continuous Placings'

I may be old fashioned, but that's how I see things, the same analogy applies here/ today as always. If you can;t afford it tough, wait till you can.

Otherwise all shareholders will be shafted by dilution and we already have more than enough of issued shares.

Hello Wizard,

IMHO, Now is not the time for wanting to buy up Angs/ Balcombe.

Why do I say that?

Simply because, we cannot afford to expand at a rate that isin excess/ incompatible with near term cash flows. HH will not finance all potential ventures just yet.

Better to prove up a small select few 'Hot Prospects' than squander cash on the likes of as yet unproven non UKOG assets.

We have enough on our plate already, more than enough assets to prove up.

Re; Bid for Angus?

No thanks, now is not the time.

Vernony,

It would appear with absolute regularity, that there is always some 5 u c k er, who wants to bear down on us and change the world.

Latest Fad, Banning Gas Boilers in New Builds.

https://www.gmb.org.uk/news/plans-ban-gas-heating-new-homes-must-be-put-hold

What is really required is a reversal of the ongoing 'Brainwashing' of our younger voters whom are in the main ignorant of what has taken place since the days of Heath and the 'Common Market' model versus the subsequent betrayal by successive UK Govt politicians through the signing of Treaties that have slowly eroded the UK's Sovereign powers.

Our younger voters have no conception of what has really been happening over the last 40 plus years. The process of giving away Sovereignty to a Foreign Power (Germany/France, the main protaganists) has been relentless.

I would very strongly urge our young citizens, to please research this very important point, in how our own politicians have been complicit in our citizens betrayal by simply giving away our 'Democracy' to Brussels.

Our politicians have known what they have been doing, but have purposely kept what they have done away and out, of sight from the people of the UK.

The most damaging treaties are yet to be enacted, namely the Lisbon Treaty signed out of sight by Gordon Brown. In more than 60 areas of policy, countries lose the right to veto legislation they disagree with - on everything from transport to the rights of criminal suspects and aspects of foreign policy.Britain would lose nearly 30% of its power to block legislation it disagrees with, while Ireland would lose 40%.

Absolutely, AIM is the pits and the sooner HUR get off it the better for price stability, although having said that, HUR SP stability has not been an issue as such but being on AIM can be, I know.