RE: Very Quiet23 Mar 2019 11:51
PNE,
I agree with everything you say. Yes, we would have to go on to drilling Te-11, which as you know I believe we would have success with. That's the irony that exists, I guess and hence why I remain disappointed that we won't have a proper poke around in the Paleozoic. And before I get corrected, I am aware that Te-10 did go a little way down into the Paleozoic, but not in the detail I believe it deserves given the massive potential it has been purported to have by the likes of BM.
However, the issue I have with some posters on here is that they can't and won't admit that failure at Te-10 will probably mean that the share price will take a pummeling. You and I and Fellrunner are happy to admit that failure would probably see a share price sub 10p and that success would probably see it rise towards 50p and then likely to increase to between 60p and 80p just prior to the share being placed into 'suspension' as we await the fabled LE RNS.
Shaungreen also knows that I am happy to donate £20 to charity should we not drill Te-11, which at this stage in time, is looking highly likely. However, Shaun has failed to comment that he is also happy to donate £20 to charity should we actually go ahead with a Te-11 drill, which I find a bit unfair.
I have covered-off both scenarios so I am not expecting a load of abuse from the usual suspects on here. Not when I have stated that success at Te-10 will have a very positive effect on the share price. I am still exercising caution at Te-10 though and will judge JP et al on results only. I want the hard facts in easy to understand language. Will I get it? Only time will tell......