RE: Arcm19 Nov 2018 11:12
I hope you don't mean me, CB? I thought we'd agreed to differ and had become future drinking buddies. :-)
Anyway, I haven't posted much lately as, as others have discovered, any legitimate doubts are often met with inappropriate responses sometimes descending to the level of personal insults. I agree with whomever said that this can be off putting for prospective investors, as they soon smell a rat.
As for grades being modest, my opinion was that the 0.67% cu eq from the assay results before the last were a far cry from what I was expecting going by the trenching results of the May 2018 Zamsort overview, which were over 4% cu eq. The market appears to have been similarly unimpressed. However I have come to realise it's not so much the richness of the grades as much as the expanse of the resource that matters to potential partners.