Member Info for JDAU

Pressing a couple of random pages into your history until I saw XTR (the furthest you can go back in one click is page 11, that was page 13), so yes, about 30 secs. “..post histories give an inaccurate reflection of a user.” - are you serious? That’s like saying “a person cannot be judged by their actions”. Granted, things can be taken out of context but in this case someone is clearly fed up with your negative posting antics, all I’m saying is that coupled with my personal assessment that’s a red flag over your head as far as I’m concerned.

Your post history sure makes for interesting reading when trying to asssess your credibility, after all of about 30 seconds research I’ve stumbled onto this gem on a thread marked “**** this company” (imaginative title btw) “Deramper?!? Never said anything about the company being bad, just CB....it's him that I am worried about.” http://www.lse.co.uk/member-info.asp?nick=Teacup64&page=13 Interesting that it’s not only me that thinks you (and plenty others) have an agenda to talk down the SP of certain companies.

I’m not attacking your “slipping faith in CB” I’m questioning your comprehension of operations here if you don’t think progress is being made. I’m not sure why you’ve stated “please, don't start with the Rome wasn't built in a day BS” - how many gold mines do you know of that are built in 6 months?!? Is that what you were expecting? It seems unfair of you to say I can’t state “well gold mines take time to set up” - they do, you need to understand that. Have a realistic view of timeframes and a basic understanding of what’s being done here and imo you have no reason to be disheartened. People like me don’t often hang around LSE daily anymore because I’ve realised what an absolute joke it is, most posters seemingly are a bunch of agenda driven, ill informed (-even when the basics are concerned), muppets who seem to be hanging around daily posting about how bad XTR is. 1 question - IF it was your money on the table, would you consistently post about how bad everything is thereby decreasing the likelihood of the sp getting back to the point where you could have your money back? No. And that tells me everything I need to know about 95% of the “genuine” investors who are “annoyed/fed up/whatever with CB”.

*cue LittleWing turning up to ask an irrelevant question (to this discussion) in order to change the subject and bring a negative slant to a different aspect of the company.

..which he’s currently doing by getting contractors to pay us a royalty for processing alluvial gravels we’d otherwise have to pay someone to move because they obstruct our hard rock... That goes for FB and the various other targets covered by the omnia collaboration agreement that we’re currently getting rock samples analysed for.. ( ref: http://www.lse.co.uk/regulatory-news-article.asp?ArticleCode=sghhkqgd&ArticleHeadline=Manica_Hard_Rock_Collaboration_Agreement ) Do you guys just not understand the story here? Or are you being wilfully ignorant in an attempt to mislead potential investors?

I’d actually rather you didn’t speak on my behalf to be honest. “..not even the loyalists are defending CB anymore.” - maybe that’s because there’s clearly a group of you bashing daily and we have better things to do with our time than argue with people who have an agenda and don’t have any interest in a constructive debate? I’m happy buying the cheap shares you guys are working so hard to push the price down on, I’ll let the company do the talking over the long term, as I’ve said previously, I’m fed up doing the graft for everyone in terms of research just to be called a ramper and be goaded into an argument. We’re not fed up, we’re still here, you can’t get rid of us, this willl turn around and i’ll be the one making money. Currently this is a circa £4m company (Mcap), imo you’re a moron if you can’t work out any potential upside. Ps teacup, you’re sounding an awful lot like Redbike nowadays..

“Nexus would be responsible for all refining costs, 60% of the smelter costs capped at US$24,000 as well as all capital costs including project equipment and project vehicles.” Ref: http://www.lse.co.uk/regulatory-news-article.asp?ArticleCode=cq5lhpej&ArticleHeadline=Alluvial_Collaboration_Agreement_terms_amended Your statement: “Nexus/MTI are not contributing anything near enough to warrant their take.” seems pretty ridiculous when you consider that they (Nexus) contribute an entirely proportionate amount towards the costs and as such take an entirely proportionate cut. The bonus is that we’re not paying 100% of the costs for 100% of the cut in what is essentially a “risky” project - one which we need progression on anyway to get to our hard rock. LittleWing, i’d suggest you read back over the RNS’s if you don’t fully understand the partnership.

You conveniently forgot to mention that Nexus are in fact our partner on this project and pay their own way in terms of operational costs in order to earn their cut. Considering alluvials is not where we plan to make our money (eg Fairbride/other hard rock) i’d suggest that having a partner for the alluvials actually benefits us, sure we end up with a smaller PROPORTIONATE cut due to us paying for less of the operating costs but that in turn translates into less risk for XTR. I’d suggest you are also completely overlooking the fact that the alluvials lie in the way of our hard rock and getting paid anything at all to shift them is a bonus play. Eyes on the prize.

I added when the market was losing its mind down at circa 1.05p... patience will make the play here imo.

Speak for yourself, I’m pretty happy with the progression on this project from predominantly Sino... Look at the produced vs sold, imo we’re (slowly) on the up and up here, more contractors, fair bride plan, further hard rock with Omnia... where’s the downside? If you have to resort to “what a boring (might I add: Profitable) update” instead of having something negative to say doesn’t that show you which direction this company is heading?

The fact that you use words such as “lol” and spell “you’re” (as in you are) without an apostrophe or an e tells me pretty much all I need to know about your mental capacity. I’d spend more time discussing there’s here if I thought you had anything to offer which wouldn’t make me less intelligent just for reading... In my opinion, you are not “invested and fuming”, you’re a bs’er who’s here to talk the company down. Why would anyone in their right mind talk their own investment down on a daily basis? Same ‘ol argument, I have no evidence to clarify that you don’t hold, but equally, you have zero proof - and when you’re asking me to take your word on something, I’m sorry, but you just don’t have that credibility in my eyes. (Cue several other posted popping up saying “I hold, and I’m angry too” or “what so we can only be postitive” etc etc- been here, done that, got the T-shirt and I really don’t plan to hang around here today slinging mud) You want an honest answer to your question? The contracts we have in place as a result of deals made by CB over the past 12 months are only just getting off the floor, they’ve endured a terrible rainy season and imo haven’t had a chance to get up to capacity yet, meanwhile every poster and his grandma seem to be an expert on gold mining and how much we can hope to see projects progress - surprise surprise, plenty of (imo bashers) are now alluvial experts and are adamant that this can’t be a successful project - contrary to pretty much any study/piece of supporting research that has been offered to the bb by myself and others, I.e. actual investors who spend their time researching the company. Crux of it is, I’m done handing out freebies in terms of research to people who don’t want to read it, I believe most of you are wrong and tbh uneducated bashers who it’s entirely pointless interacting with. I plan to make money here, and I couldn’t give a rats behind as to who listens to me anymore when I say “this can be valued at X when we hit X revenue/milestone etc”. I’m bored of sharing my research with links to make it easy for the reader only to be slammed by countless morons who are just regurgitating the same bashy posts. So you want to know where we’ve gone? Away from you lot until the company proves us right.

We’re still here... and we still own a good chunk of the company. Personally I’ve opted to stop spending so much time posting here because it’s clear there’s a large group of posters who (imo) slam the bb daily with a negative agenda. I’m fed up of trying to explain the virtues of our company to those who clearly aren’t invested and only plan to talk it down anyway.

Teacup, Sino don’t have 2 plants, they have 4. I’d suggest you listen to the podcast I’ve posted if you want to be accurate with what you’re talking about...

CB’s latest Vox markets podcast: https://www.**********.co.uk/company/XTR/multimedia/ 4.10 mins - 4.45 mins “Prospect of 6 machines, where when we started this whole thing off, we had the prospect of about 3 or 4. 6 in actual fact could be 8, with the Chinese 4, Moz gold have acquired another processing plant, and of course with omnia ...” So I make that 4 plants still in operation (Sino), 2 plants were Omnia’s (who have elected to pursue alluvials on their own concession) and 2 plants were Moz’s which for now we’re waiting to hear an outcome on.

I’m sorry Andrew, im not sure I follow, you said “we’re down to one”? Are you referring to plants in operation? We still have multiple plants operating the alluvials so I’m not sure I agree with you there..

Batfink, you’re asking a question you already know the answer to, I’m assuming in an effort to discredit my opinion? For clarity, i’d “be wrong” about all I’ve suggested this company is capable of if the company folds. As it stands, the potential I am invested for still exists, it exists at a level that in my opinion, when the market catches up, I’ll be in a position to make some good money here. For clarity, me currently being in a position of loss in no way devalues the opinion that this company, once alluvial operations have recovered from a terrible wet season & a hard rock deal is on the table, will be worth multiples of where we currently stand.

LittleWing, I’ve had “concerns here” since the Jan debacle. Fact is, CB is doing a pretty good job of fixing a problem I had: I was invested in a company that was going to go bankrupt due to the actions of a reckless ceo. I’m more than happy with progress here, the fact the market doesn’t yet place value on what I see developing here is how I plan to make my money. Is it weak that the market currently values XTR at less than £5m equating to a poor SP? Yes, I think it’s ridiculous, but it’s where we are, once revenue streams are confirmed (consistently) and hard rock is on the table a £5m mcap imo is likely to shoot up by many multiples. Do I think XTR has a solid business model which will see us make a return for very little risk? Yes. Do I think CB is the man for the job? Yes, at the moment he’s demonstrating a good ability to organise multiple revenue streams without risking the companies financial stability (further). Subsequently, do I think that XTR’s currently undervalued and will go up twice as hard as it came down? I’ll let you work that one out..

2,100,000 votes for CB to stay running the show, right here.

Not that surprising, considering how hard most of y’all have been kicking it... I’d suggest it’ll just take a little reminder for the market to wake up and remember what’s actually happening here.

Here of late? We all expected relatively poor Q1 results due to unforeseen weather conditions, they happened and now everyone seems to have forgotten the game plan here... You all realise that next news will be far increased production and hard rock fast track jv’s, right? Most people’s grasp of what’s in the pipeline is frankly embarrassing... or in my opinion, heavily driven by an agenda.