Member Info for JDAU

Forgive me for not being particularly interested in continuing a conversation with you Teacup, it’s my opinion that you’re full of ... http://www.lse.co.uk/member-info.asp?nick=Teacup64&page=29

Even a cursory glance at your first few posts on XTR shows you were trying to undermine confidence at a time where delivery of what was promised was happening and things were just starting to look up after a difficult period for holders.

For the record, I don’t believe many of the supposed “disgruntled holders” are anything other than a bunch of lying ...heads, ive put up with it for years and to be honest, I’m just coming out and calling it as I see it.

CUE the reinforcements turning up stating “I’ve been here since x and I’m actually not happy blah blah blah” in an effort to disprove my statement - anyone who’s actually endured the last few years as a shareholder as most likely in the same camp as me where they’re happy things are finally moving, even though there are some teething issues, without Colin XTR would have gone bust.
End of.

To reiterate a point I firmly stand behind, as an investor, one does not bash their own company day after day, week in week out, ignoring any positives even when they’re highlighted and constantly (not even discussing, simply) highlighting negatives.

Its pretty simple, post something that is clearly incorrect and is designed to push a negative perspective, I’m probably going to call you out on it, highlight the information freely available and prove you’re talking bs.

Equally, post something you have concerns about with perhaps links to information which could be discussed instead of just saying “the company is rubbish” and maybe we’d have a better discussion and I wouldn’t have a one track mind regarding your agenda.

Ps. Feel free to gang up on me and try to chase me off the bb as you lot always try to do, although i’d have thought by now you’d have gotten the picture that i’m an investor here, i’m not going anywhere and i’m always happy to correct you bunch of dishonest scumbags who make a living trying to lose other people money.

...and for any of you that will try to keep up appearances that you are in fact just a “concerned shareholder” i’ll look forward to celebrating with you when the inevitable good news about further alluvial contractors, hard rock drill results, fast track opportunities etc get announced - except i’d bet my left nut you’ll be keeping your heads down and won’t in fact take back any of the BS you’ve posted or admit any kind of wrongdoing, you’ll just carry on as “normal”.

Of course I believe Mr Bird is delivering/will deliver shareholder value Mike, otherwise I would have sold the shares I own in the company and moved on - that’s what an investor does when they don’t believe in a company.

Sure makes me wonder what all you lot are still doing hanging around considering your viewpoints.

I’d imagine you all post negatively biased borderline slander about the company daily because you’re just a bunch of altruists with a want to “save people investing in a poor company” - no ulterior motive whatsoever.
On reflection, the stock market (especially AIM) sure is known for everyone playing fairly, with no trace of underhanded attempts at price manipulation, isn’t it?

Ps. I accuse people of not reading RNS’s when they post a statement (or several statements) which directly contradicts what has been officially released by the company, which, as ive said hundereds of times now, is why I reference (a lot) in my posts. It allows the reader to look at what has been said by conflicting parties, look at the evidence (which I should note, tends to be me posting links to disprove some codswallop that has been posted, not often do the outlandishly bashing comments come with any evidence to back them up) and make up their own mind.

I wouldn’t have half the problem with some of the BS posted on this bb if it came with any substance, but it doesnt, the burden of proof somehow seems to lie with actual shareholders and by the point I’ve managed to make a coherent rebuttal, the merry band of morons usually turn up to throw stones left, right n’ centre as Ian once again happening this evening. That is a known tactic of groups trying to directly manipulate sentiment and hence, share price.

Ok, then against my better judgement I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and go through your issues: “He will update the website with photos - never happened.” - except that he did, and they are here, you can actually see Colin stood with a contractor: https://www.xtractresources.com/media.htm “He will do a Q&A session - never happened.” - There was a Q&A session shareholders were encouraged to participate in at the AGM, Colin subsequently has provided podcasts courtesy of Vox which discuss said Q&A’s in a summarised format: https://www.**********.co.uk/company/XTR/multimedia/ “Brilliant new RNS in 2-6wks(3-4m ago) - never happened.” - this was actually hearsay from an investor who claimed to go to the AGM, nothing official was ever actually stated by the company to this effect so in my eyes, i’d take this “deadline” with a shovel of salt, there is absolutely no way you can hold Colin accountable for something an anonymous poster claims he said (as it could just as easily be made up). “He will announce Sino production targets(400tph by Jan'18) - never happened.” - it’s not like we’ve been kept in the dark, through a combination of quarterly production updates (and other rns’s) ( http://www.lse.co.uk/share-regulatory-news.asp?shareprice=XTR&share=xtract ) , podcasts and interviews I think Colin has done a pretty sterling job of keeping shareholders informed, I sure as hell know what’s going on so I’m not sure why you’re feeling left out, have you actually seen/read the information out there? My guess would be not, given that you’re feeling like you don’t know what’s going on. “More plants being introduced to Manica - never happened.” - we’ve been kept fully informed on the situation and are currently expecting further alluvial contractor deals to be announced anytime around now, Colin even reiterated this in his Vox interview stating when he expects it to happen and when production should commence, again, i’d suggest you need to do a bit more reading/listening if you don’t know what’s going on. It is however, absolutely untrue the way you portray the current situation, just because you are not aware of the information doesn’t give you the right to say “well we haven’t been told x y z” when we in fact have, you just haven’t bothered to find out about it.

Are trying awfully hard to spam this bb with negative comments in a clear attempt to dictate sentiment aren’t you? Probably no ulterior motive though... right... guys?

You can “not bother with me” all you like mate, I’m a shareholder so I’ll still be here correcting you when you post BS about the company I own a part of and I’m more than happy to show the readers of this bb how full of it you are by posting the appropriate links to evidence which clearly shows how much you talk out of your behind.

So presumably you’re looking forward to the upcoming news of further alluvial contractors, an outcrop extension of circa 200m and information on our non FB hard rock sample results? I’ll look forward to celebrating the positive news with you.

No LW, I’m an investor with a declared interest in seeing the company that I own a part of fairly portrayed. You’d probably understand defending ones investment against BS’ers if you were actually invested here.

A politicians answer I see.

Seems awfully like your avoiding my questions by giving very generic responses little wing, and then jumping straight back on the negative train trying to tie me up answering your questions. I’m asking you specifically, what is it about Manica that you like? What makes you think it could be successful? Don’t just say “the research”, what research? I’ve been so kind as to share my findings with the group over the years yet I’ve never seen the like from yourself, when put on the spot you act with a common theme, as you literally have just done, you’ve admitted ... something.. pretty vague in terms of positive in an effort to appear balanced and then you’re back to slamming it again. I’ll ask again, what is it, specifically, that attracts you to the Manica project and makes you think it could be profitable? Do you have an opinion on the drilling campaigns previous to ours? Do you have an opinion on the grades found at our non FB hard rock assets?

Ok then, I think I’m done with this conversation, it’s a complete waste of my time and beginning to grate on me a little bit. I was simply highlighting that your comment was in poor taste and completely unnecessary for an aim share’s bb.

Actually yeah, on reflection, I can see how 40 people dead is in fact hilarious... said no-one ever.

Yeah... or perhaps just a little childish.

why did not Bird wait to see if they were in fact an experienced professional outfit before committing money to them. was this an error of judgement ? - no error in judgement, speculate to accumulate, that is to say that if they’d have been successful we would have had a pretty sweet deal set up, as it stands, they flopped, we’ve ended up with charge over an asset that’s worth more than the money we lent (in terms of potential contribution it could bring to the project/asset value) so I don’t really see an issue there. Ps I don’t have a problem with valid criticisms of the company, I do have a problem with constant (daily if not hourly) highlightlighting of anything which can even remotely be construed as negative whilst frankly ignoring any of the positives that are clear to see, the latter is clearly an attempt to destabilise shareholder confidence and that’s why I honesty don’t believe you own any shares here. Only a complete moron would trash talk a company they were invested in daily. It’s my opinion that there’s a rather large group here clearly attempting to manipulate the sentiment (as there has been for quite some time now). Convenient how you never have anything good to say (even when good news is released) don’t you think? Since we’re playing the question game then, what’s your opinon on PAF/Auroch’s previous drilling campaigns at fair bride? Maybe you’d like to comment on our fast track hard rock (non FB) collaboration agreement? Are you expecting good results in line with previous findings? Do you have a view on how likely they are to make us shareholders a return?

Why you would joke about a bridge collapsing and killing 40 or so people is beyond me...

Maybe you should consider the emotively charged language you used in the header/post? As much as you protest that you didn’t intend to criticise or provoke, to write “bored out of f’ing skull” and suggest that’s down to lack of interesting newsflow is in my opinion pretty negatively charged, inaccurate and quite provocative.

Ps. If you were actually invested here (which i don’t buy for one second) you: A) wouldn’t be so inexplicably negative about everything, all the time, in face of the multiple positives. B) would be thankful that Colin saved this company from Bankruptcy and is rebuilding shareholder value as we speak, as if he hadn’t, you’re imaginary holding would be worth a big fat imaginary £0. C) might not come across as clueless because you’d actually have read through the information available and would most likely be excited by some, if not all of it.

I have no issue believing CB is delivering shareholder value, especially after reading through the list of RNS’s. A DFS, royalty based alluvial contracts, hard rock fast track potential... failing to see the issue there. I wonder if you’ll still be here blowing the “everything is crap” trumpet once good news arrives... my guess is not, like you say LW, I’ve been here long enough, I see you for exactly what you are.

It’s my opinion that Moz left because they had a plant that couldn’t process the fine gold they were coming across. We’d loaned them some start up working capital (as clearly laid out in the RNS: http://www.lse.co.uk/regulatory-news-article.asp?ArticleCode=ir5fasw4&ArticleHeadline=Strategic_investment_in_Manica_alluvial_operator ), they spent that working capital moving earth and processing but hit a wall. They were left in a position where they were mounting up a debt (if they had planned to further draw down the CLN) with little hope of making a return without investing further in plant modifications (which they didn’t have the money for). Subsequently, they called it and without the money to pay us back, we took control of the plant. As has been explained, we are now looking at wether to modify the plant and use it ourselves or (presumably) use it as part of a deal with new/alternative contractors. “The mining results in the Western half, which Moz Gold have the exclusive mining rights to, have been unsatisfactory, primarily due to the nature of the gold, being fine gold and a plant not fit for purpose of the recovering this gold.” http://www.lse.co.uk/regulatory-news-article.asp?ArticleCode=3lrh2cc5&ArticleHeadline=Results_of_AGM_and_Alluvial_Update What is your specific issue with the Moz scenario? (Other than of course using it as an assumed negative to try and focus people’s attention on?)

I fail to see what’s not exciting about the news flow here? You’re “bored” just as it’s starting to get interesting and we might have some decent news on hard rock progression / new partners announced? Yes. I’d suggest you are in fact impatient and you clearly didn’t have a realistic timeline of how long building a mine/successful project would take. You realise the whole time we’re sat around ‘without news materialising’ that Sino are processing gold bearing alluvials which we’re getting a cut of, right? ..and have you missed the fact that we’re currently waiting on sampling results related to our non-FB hard rock collab agreement? - this translates very simply into seeing progression on our non DFS’d hard rock targets. Maybe if you had a better grasp of the timeline of events and when to expect further information you wouldn’t be “bored”, you’d be patiently excited. I’ve been here about 3 1/2 years and ever since Manica was on the table, THIS is the bit i’ve been waiting for. It’s just the beginning IMO, and you’re “bored”. Ok then...