Member Info for JDAU

Sorry Teacup, was that you attempting to disprove anything i’m actually saying?
Or just you attacking my character in attempt to discredit me?

I ask, because it sure does sound like the latter on the basis that you can’t do the former...

I can’t accept it because you’re wrong.

Our production profile is increasing, so is the amount of money making its way to XTR, costs are reducing, we’re awaiting more alluvial contractors coming on board, and on top of all that we’re on the cusp of more significant production (I.e hard rock) and you’re all acting like that isn’t happening.

Your consistent negative posting with a complete disregard for any positive moves the company makes only leads me to believe one thing, which is that you (along with plenty of others) are part of a group with an agenda - as is (imo) proven by all the “cronies” jumping on the bandwagon with any negative post.

... so don’t buy any more shares?

No-ones asking you to Jezzoo, however, pretending that we’re not in a healthier state than this time last year, or that our production profile isn’t increasing, or that our hard rock isn’t due to start Q1 next year, or that CB isn’t the one actually orchestrating all of this - all of which I can actually show you (if you’re too lazy to read for yourself?) is simply ridiculous.

I’m not sure that you stating that my argument doesn’t have any gravitas actually means anything.. i’m simply demonstrating that most posters here clearly know F all about it’s operations judging by the sorts of posts that are made, which, in my opinion, are done by an organised group of bashers attempting to manipulate the share price.

Our production profile is increasing, we clearly aren’t selling all the gold being produced yet the “expert posters” here would happily have you believe otherwise - without any shred of evidence. The likes of teacup, happyhex, little wing etc can barely post without having a stab at the company or Colin Bird, which leads me to believe that they are very much part of the infestation here.

If they got the facts right I probably wouldn’t have much to post in retaliation, but I’ve actually lost count of the amount of times I’ve had to call BS and trawl through news releases to prove they were BS’ing because they make loose statements which clearly aren’t true, and then they just carry on like nothing happened.

One word. Bashers.

Your attempts to discredit me simply makes me question your motives Jez, considering how long you’ve been around this bb and subsequently you know my posting style, you know I’m one of the few to actually post evidence for statements and one of the even fewer to share research.

Say what you will about me Jez, anyone with half a brain can see that I’m telling the truth because I provide the evidence.

It’ll all come out in the wash...

...and a special thanks to Jessell for very much proving my point.

Not sure why you’re suggesting I was banned here Jezzoo, I assume in some sort of vague attempt to discredit me?
What would I have been banned for? Highlighting where others are BSing by clearly demonstrating an understanding of the information released and by referencing RNS’s?

Thing is mate, I back up statements I make with actual evidence, you lot just post nonsense and when called out on it you can’t actual provide an argument or anything substantial in terms of evidence that sticks, this normally turns into the gang turning up to sling mud OR as you’ve done above, by playing the Man, not the ball.

A really lame attempt Jez, even from you.

Just to clarify a couple of things..

Our share of alluvial gold production is increasing quarter on quarter:
Q1 - 297 Oz
Q2 - 426 Oz
Q3 - 453 Oz

Our cost per ounce produced is dropping quarter on quarter:
Q1 - $902
Q2 - $741
Q3 - $645

We’re clearly not selling all of our share of the gold produced as is demonstrated by the difference between amount produced and amount sold, one could assume therefore that we’re stockpiling some gold in order to see us through any ‘tougher months’ - a good move in order to provide cash flow stability avoiding the need for a fund raise through desperation.

We’re also aiming to start hard rock production at the start of next year:
“Pit and process planning underway to commence hard rock mining in the 1st Quarter of 2019”

Reference: http://www.lse.co.uk/share-regulatory-news.asp?shareprice=XTR&ArticleCode=cvxaj1qr&ArticleHeadline=Manica_Concession_Alluvial_Gold_Quarterly_Update

So why is it that you lot of bashers are talking so much rubbish?

I’m sick to the back teeth of what is clearly an organised group of you doing everything in your power to
Knock confidence in the company, what you’re doing is clearly against LSE rules and borderline market manipulation.
It’s rather pathetic that LSE don’t do more to weed you out, but as we’ve seen this morning, you just create another username after being banned and start the shenanigans again.

It’s not about me not agreeing with an opinion, it’s that your opinions are a heap of ... designed to do nothing else but manipulate the share price into pushing south.

The business is in better shape than most posters here portray as is clearly demonstrated by just a few items i’ve Highlighted above. Stop the BS.

Ps I “did it last quarter too” because again, it was abundantly apparent last quarter that that was the case.
Explorata’s share of gold produced was 426 equivalent ounces and Explorata’s share of gold sold was 283 equivalent ounces.

Ref: http://www.lse.co.uk/share-regulatory-news.asp?shareprice=XTR&ArticleCode=52tpsucv&ArticleHeadline=Manica_Concession_Alluvial_Gold_Quarterly_Update

Let me spell it out for absolute clarity.

We are producing more gold than we are selling, if you don’t believe me, read the quarterly RNS’s, add up all the rows that say “Explorator share of gold produced (equivalent ounces)” and subtract all the rows that say “Explorator share of gold sold (equivalent ounces)”.

So is the problem that CB isn’t communicating properly? Or is it simply that some of you don’t understand the basics?

Yes, really.

A poster is complaining that CB isn’t communicating properly because they’re too lazy to do some basic addition and subtraction for a figure they wish to know - all the figures one would need to work that figure, I.e “how much more gold have we produced than sold” are contained in the RNS(‘s)

You can’t say CB isn’t communicating clearly when it literally takes adding up 3 numbers and subtracting 3 others to Understand what’s going on.

Interesting how some of us aren’t “confused”... isn’t it?

The table included in the latest RNS (and previous quarterly RNS’s) clearly states what has been produced and what has been sold, it does everything except add up one group of numbers and subtract another... do you really need them to spell it out for you?

Suppressed gold price & the ability to sell stockpiled gold over any potential quieter months (in terms of production) to maintain cash flow stability.

Almost every business holds stock of the goods they sell...

The plant is to be commissioned in November.

Failing to see how the commencement of hard rock mining in Q1 2019 is a bad thing?

LittleWing, here’s a hint: look at the amount of gold attributable to Explorator that was produced and then at the amount sold over past few quarters, we’re clearly not selling all the gold produced.

Or maybe we’re just bored with the relentless negative agenda driven BS you lot post day in day out..
Seems rather pointless putting together a cogent argument to just be shot down without any intelligent debate being spammed with “no, Bird should retire lol ;)” until I stop posting.

I’m quite literally bored of talking to you lot because I don’t really respect any of your opinions as it’s clear you’re not discussing this company with any meaning or without bias, you simply bash the bejesus out of it day on day.

I’m fed up of trying to convince people of something I know will come good, looks like i’ll just have to put up with you bashers until we start to gain some traction, no doubt then you’ll all “see the light”... or just log in to your positive accounts and start ramping just as hard as you’re bashing at the moment.

Until then, I’ll probably do something more productive and occasionally get suckered into proving that what you guys post is complete nonsense.

Gold price up circa 1.2% today at around the $1236 mark.

With news on several fronts expected it’s a good time for the gold price to strengthen...
Diwali is at the end of this month too if i’m not mistaken, I wouldn’t have thought CB’s timing on news is anything other than planned!

I completely disagree, why would you want the man (CB) removed who:
- prevented XTR from going bankrupt due to the reckless actions of the previous CEO
- sorted out our crippling debt issue, left by our previous CEO
- organised contracts by which we’re getting payment for removing our alluvials which we’d otherwise have to pay to move in order to access our hard rock, I.e actually got us to a point where we’re producing
- has put in place a fast track hard rock JV which is progressing positively
- has quite literally kept the lights on and subsequently given shareholders a glimmer of hope for the future
- Is putting together a 3 year plan with costings etc with a view to rebuilding market confidence in XTR
- etc etc

Your views make zero sense.

In my opinion, this negative agenda driven spiel you keep re-iterating day after day after day about Colin stepping down is designed to do nothing else but knock confidence in the company.

Point taken, so you agree that our production of alluvial gold is in fact increasing, regardless of where we stand on tonnage throughput?

Not too sure what you’re insinuating, I didn’t state we were at 400tph, I stated there has been a production increase of circa 42% quarter on quarter for which I don’t think it’s fair to act like we’re standing still... and that unless you can provide some evidence for tonnage throuput, to be blunt, you don’t know what the tonnage processed is, so you have absolutely no right to state that we’re at capacity...

Can I just clarify something else with you, are you saying that Sino operate one 200tph plant?
Could you show me your evidence for that too please because I don’t agree with you.

That statement just about sums up your posting style doesn’t it... “I do not need evidence”.

Let me try this again, care to share your information on tonnage throughput of Sino quarter to quarter so you can show me that the circa 42% production increase was, as you say, “Sino being lucky, nothing more”?
I.e that that increase in production was in fact nothing to do with an increase in tonnage throughput and was simply down to pot luck of a gold grade, as you’re stating.

I can simplify my request if you need?

Show me/reference the information which gives you the right to state that tonnages have not been increased.

Just for absolute clarity, you stated: “if CB is not willing to enforce the 400tph contractual term, then we will continue to get the same measly amounts of gold, that you would otherwise twist as an increase.”

So what’s your view on the 41.93% production increase? That it didn’t happen? What am I twisting?
I’m suggesting we’re not getting “the same measly amount of gold”, we got a circa 42% increase quarter to quarter, that’s pretty substantial.

Doesn’t that make your above statement just completely false?

I ask, because to me it’s pretty black and white, you’re stating we won’t get more gold / a production increase due to CB’s inaction in spite of the fact that we clearly are increasing production / getting more gold quarter to quarter when we wouldn’t be getting anything if CB hadn’t put these deals in place.

I’m confused because you’re wrong and posting as though you’re right...