Member Info for JBT2007

Still very limited stock and they are still reporting the buys as "unknowns". I also suspect that there is still a large order being filled in the background, let's see what the end of the day brings. There should be significant upward movement in this in the relatively short term, fingers crossed.

And there it is, the large order being filled in the background (1.4m) as mentioned earlier. No wonder it was hard to buy today. Potential news?

The "unknown" trade reported as timed at 11:24am was my buy at 9.2p. Struggling to get any more though.

Interesting, and there's a delay in reporting the trades.

Just bought a few more, but couldn't get the quantity that I wanted and tricky to get a price. Anybody else having similar issues? There don't appear to be many sellers out there, or we still have large orders being filled in the background.

50 to 60% up in the last 6 months JohnBriggs, already had a rerate with more to come!

Hello Panman, any particular reason that you "presume" that MS are holding them on behalf of clients? My understanding is that if they were there would be no need for the TR1. This may help.

"In UK company law, indirect voting rights refer to voting power held through a chain of legal entities, where one entity controls the voting rights of another, and so on, eventually leading to an individual or group who indirectly controls the voting power. This contrasts with direct voting rights, where the shareholder owns the shares and directly exercises their voting power."

If you look at section 9 of the TR1 you will see that there are four separate legal entities of MS all ultimately controlled by "Morgan Stanley (Chain 1)"

I understand that this is the reason that the shares are reported as having indirect voting rights rather than direct, happy to be corrected though.

Do we have yet another idiot? Joined LSE on the 26th March, very similar to Pondlife and Mainstay and all 3 spend most of their time on the PREM board, what an amazing coincidence!

Thanks Santiagot, useful link that confirms that HL are not the shareholder, they are merely the nominee as per this bit.

"A nominee shareholder can be an individual or a corporation. In short, a nominee shareholder is just the shareholder of a company in name as the nominee shareholder does not really own shares or anything.

On behalf of the actual shareholder, a nominee shareholder only acts as a legal, unrelated, third party who is officially registered as the holder of shares. This shields the actual share owner from being associated with a particular company publicly."

Most people understand that platforms like HL don't own the actual shares they just hold them on behalf of small retail customers, in the customers ISA, trading account or pension, simple really.

Enjoy your Easter weekend.

That's where you belong Pondlife, the FACT that you don't understand what a nominee shareholder is says it all. As I said completely clueless. Have a good weekend, perhaps do some reading.

Pondlife is completely clueless IK. Literally doesn't know what he is doing. Posting up links that he doesn't have the faintest idea about. The idea that HL is an actual real shareholder rather than simply a nominee as the rest of us know is beyond him. Shame. He actually thinks that HL "own" 10% of CEG but hasn't got the capacity to go back through the RNS's to see that there has never been a TR1 issued in their name. Genuinely clueless.

Oh dear.. you genuinely don't understand do you. HL hold shares as nominees for their small investor clients. They do not own shares themselves. Other platforms such as Interactive Investors (iii) or Halifax share services also crop up under the shareholders list from time to time. Again they hold the shares on behalf of their small investor clients that hold them in ISA's or pensions for example. It isn't hard really but you are clearly out of your depth. Perhaps you should consider doing some reading and research to bring yourself up to date, I don't think the AIM market is for you. Or are you just a paid troll that turned up on the 15th March? I see that your main stomping ground is PREM.

Good grief Ponderosal, as I said absolutely clueless. Your ignorance is breath taking. HL are not shareholders they act as nominees for small investors. Are you really that thick?

They're not holding it as nominees, there would be no need for the TR1 if they were.

As I said, clueless! Every trade has a buyer and a seller. Which part of Morgan Stanleys increased acquisition don't you understand? There have to be sellers for the buyers to acquire, you both need to go back to school and learn the basics of the markets because you are clearly clueless. Ponderosal is just as bad, although I strongly suspect that he and Mainstay are one and the same poster.

So Morgan Stanley are now comfortably the largest single shareholder and the largest institutional shareholder by some margin. They clearly believe in the investment case and they have far more due diligence resources than anybody on this BB. You'll still get the usual suspects knocking it though, clueless!

Well there's the RNS as expected/hoped for, interestingly it also confirms that there must be another big buyer in the background because there have been significantly more "unknown" share trades than those admitted in the RNS. If it is MS then we will get another RNS post haste, if not then there is IMHO another buyer in the background. Watch this space.

Over the last couple of weeks we have had significant "unknown" trades going through. On the face of it is doesn't appear to be MS as they would have gone through another % point and we should have had an RNS. However, if it was another buyer accumulating then we wouldn't need an RNS until they reached 3% ownership which if it is just one buyer they must be there or thereabouts following all of the late trades reported this evening. Anybody have any thoughts? It is interesting, another US accumulator? Hopefully that RNS will appear soon and we will have a better insight. Certainly food for thought as there is clearly very keen interest and somebody with deep pockets. GLA.

They haven't been bad for everybody Zag, some people have made decent profits and there's a lot more to come!

Over 1.6m reported after the close, one for 1m. Interesting, if this was Morgan Stanley then we should get a TR1 by Monday or Tuesday at the latest. They may be near to 10% at this rate. This should move to nearer 15p in the not too distant future. GLA.