RE: 20p support28 Oct 2024 13:14
@TerryM1 You fogot to mention Starmer scrapping the Rwanda deal AFTER it had been approved to go ahead (too many Starmer failures on the list already eh?!). Starmer should have said, we'll trial Rwanda for 6 months then review it. Take a look at the migrants (i.e. or should I say illegal ECONOMIC MIGRANTS) charts - it virtually stopped dead in its tracks when Rwanda deal was almost formalised. Mark my words, without a deterent, millions will be let in. Watch society change for the worse. We had a hotel in our area that was closed and re-furbished for migrants. The hotel was opposite a primary school, and next to a high school. It turned out that within a few months, teachers and parents noticed that the economic migrants (all young men) were hanging around the schools and trying to groom the kids. Very quickly and quietly, the miigrants were moved on...no doubt to another hotel that is not too close to schools. The hotel is still closed for now. What a sad state of affairs and Labour has no plans to change the status quo. It is impossible to 'smash the gangs' from the UK. It is in Europe's interests to usher these young men through to the boats and send them on a one-way ticket to the UK. This is not a simple matter of migration. The young men who keep arriving is the equivilent of an army. Just wait, within 10 years the UK will be transformed - more thefts, more knife crime, more grooming, more rapes than ever before. The fact is Rwanda is a deterent, and it is certainly better than no deterent at all. Oh well, never mind Mr Starmer, let's instead cut the winter fuel allowance for our elderly (to pay for migrant hotels, clothes, mobiles, pizzas, education, and unemployment benefits). Our elderly are the same people who have paid into the system and contributed to our society for generations. But what does that matter to Starmer the 'Human Rights' lawyer. You can bet he won't live anywhere near where these migrants are settling...