Member Info for jackdaw99

Thing is Ezekiel, that if scullduggery and big cars is their only motive, why they didn't just go into banking, accountancy or law? Surely that would have been easier, and more certain, than all this science nonsense??

Could be interesting. Others are also seeing the potential in this area, eg Swiss conglomerate Lonza (with annual sales of around 5 billion CHF) recently acquired two smaller start-ups in this area (HansaBioMed Life Sciences in Estonia, and Exosomics Siena, in Italy.

Yes, but it's all relative!

Agreed. I'll ignore them.

5006, I guess you are writing in your second language so, apologies, but I have no idea what you are trying to say. I take full responsibility!

Does Cammy work for the Home Office?

jl5006, Did you mean to post that on the OXB board? Sounds more like RENE.

Not really my field but doesn't the flag indicate a likely strong break to the upside around the end of June?

Hopefully not the crazy re-rate just seen by IMM....

Well, compared with some IPOs POLX is faring quite well. And MTFB should get stronger from this point. Not looking too bad from here IMO.

Looks like it might have put the wind up some MTFB investors.

No offence meant. I just get weary of the type of posts that state things like "I just bought 2000 more at 3.106 p" or "Sold more at 10.7p so as to buy that new Vauxhall". Yours was not as bad as those but, basically, does anyone really care when others buy and sell? If an institution starts selling ten million, well that might be something interesting, but a retired accountant from Bexhill buying and selling - no. Unfortunately, the threads of full of people thinking the rest of us are fascinated by their every thought - perhaps it's the Facebook generation??

Why on earth do you think any of us are interested in that on this thread? Completely irrelevant.

Yes, I wondered the same on the AMP thread. It must be a temptation.

From the AMP RNS 29/3/18. Might well be too simple (as I say, not my field) but investors seem to have put in �2.2 million pre-IPO for which they seem to have received the equivalent of (at launch) 53 million shares (ie, the 73 million that now exist minus the 20 million that have just been created), giving 4 pence per share.Happy to be educated here!

However, if my sums are correct, those partciipating in the pre-IPO fundraising paid only about 4p, so selling for 12p+ seems a good deal. Disclaimer: I don't work in company finance so these calculations may not be correct DYOR.

15p

.. whose selling this am?

" The NHS now have a large stake in the Iona test and would be happy to help seek a mutually agreeable conclusion. " Good to know that ;-)

Good post. There still might be bumps in the road but I can't see Illumina, with the EU already watching them closely, acting too punitively towards NIPT. A reasonable license fee or agreement would be a positive to the regulators: an attempt to chase us out of Europe, as some here have suggested, would be courting a harsh judgement from the EU monopolies people - who certainly have shown several times that they do have teeth.