Member Info for isas

some big sell this morning.

Fantasy- not negative but critical of the actions hinted at but not delivered. My guess is as to what happened yesterday is that it was engineered by a group or some organisation to offload a few or as was suggested by Bouncer he bought a few millions and that started the ball rolling.

As it happens worth reminding that we are in the middle of 8th week for the 4 -5 week period mentioned by AP for the SRK report.

Sandy- on the contrary we could do with some up-man-ship and ego's to match holdings, if that gets us to a decent share price- at the moment only way to get to my average.

Good bit of optimism whilst it lasted, back to where we were this morning- the cynical in me would say was manufactured to off load- hope the cynic in me is wrong.

Mizman, (SRK Reports) is that based on some information or is it calculated guess?

Fantasy- not sure I want to go into management theory and practice, but I am sure the board have got a series of objectives and work programme area to measure themselves against. I would have thought that it was the responsibility of the chairman and non executive directors to hold the executives to account and for us shareholders to hold the chair and non executive directors to account that they are looking after the shareholders interest- in most other company's the directors put themselves for election by rotation at the AGM. I have been a shareholder of vast for over 5 years never had the opportunity to vote for or against any board member.

As long as it is not like Mercuria 2. SRK would have been a timeline as they had done a significant amount of work for Mercuria in their dd and the board lead in supervising the contract needs to get a grip on the situation.

Good interims and a mega-contract win, could expect some traffic on this bb today.

Fantasy- not just AP but the whole board have failed and in particular the chairman who has been totally inept in holding the CEO to account on behalf of the shareholders- Whats the constitution don't they have to be re-elected by shareholders by rotation at the AGM?

Agree Dodge, I don't know why people start justifying/normalising funding requirements, when it was particularly stated that everything has been done to deliver the stated aims- it would/and should be a shock if the finance and projects are delivered as per say. I for one would suggest that if there is any mention of further placing then it is time for the bod to resign/or sacked- enough is enough.

Fantasy- I would start of by sacking the chair first, it's a pity there is no mechanism through the rotation process that the board are required to be put for re-election.

I am not sure repeating ad-infinitum the same story does for investment in Zimbabwe- they need to get on and sign the agreements and have substantive news to have investment community on board.

Board needs to take some action in terms of communicating/updating.

The fact is that the shareholders have been conned left-right and centre. Ben Turney is the worst of the lot because he came to line his pockets by pretending to be part of the shareholders interest group. Putting Eridge (NEW) shareholders money into NTOG and BST is a method of laundering money through their mates/groups .

False alarm back to normal service.

A sudden jump in prize on very small volume- anyone L2 whats happening?

Exactly, I think a few weeks back someone posted that they had a response from Vast that the SRK report was on track- AP had mentioned end of June/ beginning of July, we are in second half of July, this is supposed to be under our control we are paying SRK to produce the report, who ever is stearing from Vast on this needs to take a stock of the situation.

When is our turn to get the signature?

AP- need to wake up SRK.