Member Info for investor33

Abzzba ; well done for that letter yiu did earlier in the year.

What we need I feel is for the company itself to make a formal complaint to the LSE about the toxicity that has been directed towards their company, as well as what is obvious harassment of their share holders on here.

I'm sure that they do read this board, and are already aware.

Dies anybody have any actual screen shots of what has been written - the cancer, heart attack comments etc ?

I suggest that everyone writes to the company quoting what was said in the announcement yesterday about the LSE working with the FCA in order to " funnel complaints to enforcement agencies. " The company really needs to submit a formal complaint to the LSE.

I have a copy of a letter which I wrote a while back to the owners of this site, so I will send them that, as it gives a load of quotes re people wishing cancer, heart attacks etc. General online harassment of genuine share holders in fact.

Well said Manx.

Such a shame that someone like you has to even share a board with the likes of KevinRound with his £500 micro trades. Yet he makes far more noise on here than the likes of you..

KevinRound finally showing his true colours at last.

He's here to taunt people with large holdings out of spite. He's probably jealous that others could even afford say 20m shares given that he is a wanabee trader who he said on another board lost money in his first three years...

He took up day trading during COVID thinking he could build up his pension. Well, how's that plan working out then ?

" the LSE aims to funnel detailed referrals to enforcement agencies " it said in the announcement.

It also encouraged companies to make complaints about toxicity directed towards their company.

I'm going to write to the company asking that they make a formal complaint to the LSE about what has been written by the likes of 198 and " doc " on this board - some of which are clearly criminal acts.

I might send an email to the company referencing the LSE wanting to sort out the toxic nature of these kinds of boards as per the announcement yesterday.

If they were to write to the London Stock Exchange directly they could complain about the toxicity that has been directed towards the company on this board, and the harassment of its genuine share holders on here by some. The LSE announcement talked about possible criminal action being pursued.

That's correct TBT...though KevinRound might squeeze in for say one day based on a £500 micro day trade...

It's a shame that there can't be some kind of system on these kinds of boards in which the capacity to post is proportional to how many shares a person holds in the company. In which case the likes of KevinRound might be allocated say around 2 letters of the alphabet....

KevinRound; I would have thought that any news is far more relevant to the big players in this company, such as that guy Manx, who apparently has accumulated about 20m shares.

Unfortunately the board tends to get filled with posts by the likes of you, with your micro trades, winning or losing around £35 in any given day trade punt. I guess rubbing shoulders with the serious players makes you feel good though😂

AI answer ;

"In the context of oil and gas exploration in Mongolia, "updip at Gazelle" refers to the specific geological location of the Gazelle-1 exploration well in the North of Block XX. The well is positioned on the western flank of the Tamsag Basin, structurally updip of PetroChina's T19-46-1 discovery well.

Geological Significance

Updip Position: In geology, "updip" refers to a location that is higher on a dipping (sloping) rock layer compared to another point. In oil exploration, oil and gas naturally migrate upwards through permeable rock layers until they are trapped by an impermeable layer or a structural feature.

Hydrocarbon Migration: The Gazelle-1 well is strategically located directly on the same migration path, and updip of a proven oil discovery (T19-46-1) made by PetroChina. This positioning was intended to intercept the migrating hydrocarbons, increasing the chances of a successful discovery.

Source Kitchen Proximity: The area is considered to be updip of the largest identified "source kitchen" area in the Tamsag Basin, which is the primary region where oil is generated.

In the oil and gas industry, a source kitchen, also known as a hydrocarbon kitchen or oil/gas kitchen, is a subsurface geological area where source rock has reached the necessary temperature and pressure conditions to generate and expel commercially significant amounts of oil and natural gas. "

Judging by the replies, I presume that the green box after my last post was the 198 person replying to my post.

Months ago now I unfiltered him for a couple of days in order to quote what he had been writing to the owners, and then noticed that he had been replying immediately to most of my posts. That's the acid test of a troll - you can filter them, but they will never filter you. In fact just the opposite, they want to reply to everything you write whether you will read it or not. The sign of an unhinged individual who craves attention and relevance.

Abzzba I'm sure that an oil major would just want to buy it. They will know all about how successful block 19 was in the same Tamsag basin.

A large part of the 9m barrels per annum at the peak in 2014 - nine years after PC bought it from Soco - will have been coming from block 19. Imagine how much PC must have made from block 19.

Also, why do so many people have such a blind spot about block 20 being bought out ? MB referred to this in the last presentation, and this was before the Gazelle result was known about. people only ever refer to a possible farm in situation for some reason.

The thing is that there is a precedent for a similar field being bought by PC in 2005. They bought block 19 - which is in the same Tamsag basin as our block 20 - from Soco, when Soco had managed only what we are producing now ( 350 bpd) from some 27 wells. It didn't stop PC from buying it for what in today's money would be around $150m. In 2014, at the peak of Mongolian production, block 19 together with block 21 were producing around 9m barrels per annum. This accounted for nearly all the oil being extracted in Mongolia at the time.

Block 20 is also partly covered by 3D data, whereas when Soco sold block 19 there was no 3D data that had been done.

I guess if Hallowed was looking at RR when it was 30p in 2020 during covid, he would have said that the market knows best and that's why it is valued as it is.....

Hallowed's comments about SYME ;

" I still have so many doubts here but good luck to those who stuck with the company.

For now putting money into this remains a punt, not an investment or a risk/reward trade in the normal sense of the term.

(I’m one PI who learned the hard way). "

So he then comes on here and lectures PIs on what they should or shouldn't do. Sad.

Hallowed ; maybe we should all go over to your SYME then ? I mean that's as abject a share price performance as would be possible for any company. 0.58p in 2021 to 0.0044p today is it ?

You sound bitter about it, and want to spread your misery to the boards of other companies. Sad.

Not really surprising, as the Saudis need $95 a barrel to balance their budget.

Https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/OPEC-Keeps-Oil-Output-Steady-and-Approves-Historic-Capacity-Mechanicsm.html

Nandl ; you didn't mind Kevinround's childish drivel from last week then ? Thanks for moderating the board - maybe try applying for a job with LSE ?

KevinRound posting at 6.06 all poised and ready to put in his £500 trade....Building up his pension pot ready to retire in luxury in 20 years time. I guess posting on here helps him feel important before he starts his real job.