Member Info for Intrusivethought

Right, so no prospects microled colour conversion, or ELQD?

FH, are display prospects zero?

Did the settlement entail any off-balance-sheet aspects? We do not know. Time will tell.

So display prospects are zero? Yes?

OK, I'll see you there thicko. Bring a bucket.

F__k me FH again, the serial buy high sell lower merchant. You know F all knowledge of the technology but enough to know that display is dead. Thanks Warren.

Yeah of course, because that is the strategy and QD's are a commodity. Dumb c**t. Also, putting the comany up for sale will lead to an increase in the share price, but that doesn't mean it is in the interest of shareholders to do so. You need to go back to business school.

It's not looking likely, but I wouldn't completely rule out NIR material in the iphone this year. The relevant component was fully developed and tested, thus ready-to-go if required.

Less than four months since the settlement was finalised. Utter stupidity. Pickett was part of the litigation decision making process. Remove the board, lose him, game over. Fixation on the Samsung settlement when the organic prize is far bigger and was quite possibly being inhibited by the IP validity uncertainty.

Please can you identify the 17 patents?

Amen.

Nanostory, you really are an idiot.

Used but then ultimately rejected. Tech cadmium based and suitable only for edge-lit LCD displays. QD Vision failed.

No formal offer was made for Nanoco by Samsung.

Smokescreen also correct.

Zero QD Vision tech being utilised at present. Entirely cadmium based and hot injection production method. Were in a bidding war with NNCrystal to purchase, mainly for their IP/technology relating to electroluminescent QDs (QLED trademark), which had ultimately proved unsuccessful.

Thank you.

Yes.

If you know f**k all about the company, its history and it's technology, then best to f**k off. What's your average?

What's your average?